ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 46 P/HUM/2018 TENTANG UJI MATERIIL ATAS PERATURAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2018 DITINJAU DARI PER-SPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

The general election commission sets rules number 20 of 2018 concerning the nomination of legislative members who prohibit former corruption inmates from participating in general elections, it has become a polemic between whether or not to nominate as a legislative member which is contained in the decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018. The writer considers it necessary to review legal considerations and analyze them from a human rights perspective. The problem statements are how the basis of the judge's consideration of the decision of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 and how the Supreme Court decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018 reviewed from a human rights perspective. This type of research is Juridical-Normative with a legal, conceptual and doctrinal approach. Legal materials used include law, books, journals and related materials. Legal material collection techniques used library studies while the analysis of legal materials used qualitative description analysis. The discussion in this research began with the testing basis of the Supreme Court Number 46 P/HUM/2018 and review legal considerations from decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018, then analyzed the decision from a human rights perspective. The conclusion of this research are first that the panel of judges do not properly analyze the substance of Article 240 verse (1) letter g and do not grant an application for objection to material test rights. Secondly, human rights can be restricted and revoked as long as there are court decisions and are regulated in law