none2noAn Analysis of the positions of G. Radbruch and Hans Kelsen in the debate of the second half of the 20th CenturyopenBongiovanni, Giorgio; Mauro, BarberisBongiovanni, Giorgio; Mauro, Barberi
Hans Kelsen and Max Weber are conventionally understood as the original proponents of two distinct a...
This paper mentions the debate between Kelsen and Hart about the sanction (punishment) as a structur...
In the last twenty years there has been a remarkable revival of historical modes of argument and jus...
An Analysis of the positions of G. Radbruch and Hans Kelsen in the debate of the second half of the ...
none1noDOI volume 10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3A reconstruction of the principal theories referring to l...
Germany legal thought gave in the twentieth century several names of world renown: Emil Lask, Hans K...
This essay offers an investigation on the debated question of Radbruch’s supposed turn from positivi...
This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the stra...
Eugenio Bulygin, in one of his first published work, dated 1965 (Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit), consi...
Eugenio Bulygin, in one of his first published work, dated 1965 (Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit), consi...
Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition provides the first sustained examination of Hans Kelsen’s ...
The received view among legal theorists has been that Gustav Radbruch’s post-war standpoint was that...
The tensions between iusnaturalism and contemporary legal positivism involve definitions around the ...
State of the art about legal positivism contemporary debate in Civil law countries
A debate occurred in 1958 at the Harvard Law Review has become a landmark for contemporary philosoph...
Hans Kelsen and Max Weber are conventionally understood as the original proponents of two distinct a...
This paper mentions the debate between Kelsen and Hart about the sanction (punishment) as a structur...
In the last twenty years there has been a remarkable revival of historical modes of argument and jus...
An Analysis of the positions of G. Radbruch and Hans Kelsen in the debate of the second half of the ...
none1noDOI volume 10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3A reconstruction of the principal theories referring to l...
Germany legal thought gave in the twentieth century several names of world renown: Emil Lask, Hans K...
This essay offers an investigation on the debated question of Radbruch’s supposed turn from positivi...
This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the stra...
Eugenio Bulygin, in one of his first published work, dated 1965 (Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit), consi...
Eugenio Bulygin, in one of his first published work, dated 1965 (Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit), consi...
Hans Kelsen and the Natural Law Tradition provides the first sustained examination of Hans Kelsen’s ...
The received view among legal theorists has been that Gustav Radbruch’s post-war standpoint was that...
The tensions between iusnaturalism and contemporary legal positivism involve definitions around the ...
State of the art about legal positivism contemporary debate in Civil law countries
A debate occurred in 1958 at the Harvard Law Review has become a landmark for contemporary philosoph...
Hans Kelsen and Max Weber are conventionally understood as the original proponents of two distinct a...
This paper mentions the debate between Kelsen and Hart about the sanction (punishment) as a structur...
In the last twenty years there has been a remarkable revival of historical modes of argument and jus...
DOI
Add to ORKG