In this paper we will discuss the notion of prominence in morphology by reviewing how morphological heads are defined through their prominence at different levels. After outlining the main issues and, specially, the problems posed by heads in morphology, we consider how prominence and headedness are dealt with in two different influential contemporary theories: Minimalism and Construction Morphology. Despite being very different in many respects, the two models agree that there is no need for a structural notion of head, because interpretability is guaranteed by the interplay of features within complex constituent
This paper considers and compares the status of the concept of head within different grammatical fra...
It is widely attested, cross-linguistically, for both words and prosodic morphemes to be required to...
International audienceWe question here the modalities of the relationship between an abstract struct...
In this paper we will discuss the notion of prominence in morphology by reviewing how morphological ...
This article presents a symmetrical approach to headedness in German morphology. All affixes are ass...
The 'traditional' distinction of compounds into endocentric (Eng. doorknob) and exocentric (pickpock...
none2An innovative notion of head is proposed: there are not only categorial and semantic heads but ...
none2siThis volume is the first handbook devoted entirely to the multitude of frameworks adopted in ...
This paper provides an account of how certain instances of “headedness” in segmental phonology may b...
none2siThis opening chapter provides an overview of the aims, structure, and contents of the volume....
Much of the NP- vs. DP-debate has relied on largely conceptual and theory-internal arguments. In thi...
In most grammatical models, hierarchical structuring and dependencies are considered as central feat...
Contains fulltext : 3884.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
This paper considers and compares the status of the concept of head within different grammatical fra...
It is widely attested, cross-linguistically, for both words and prosodic morphemes to be required to...
International audienceWe question here the modalities of the relationship between an abstract struct...
In this paper we will discuss the notion of prominence in morphology by reviewing how morphological ...
This article presents a symmetrical approach to headedness in German morphology. All affixes are ass...
The 'traditional' distinction of compounds into endocentric (Eng. doorknob) and exocentric (pickpock...
none2An innovative notion of head is proposed: there are not only categorial and semantic heads but ...
none2siThis volume is the first handbook devoted entirely to the multitude of frameworks adopted in ...
This paper provides an account of how certain instances of “headedness” in segmental phonology may b...
none2siThis opening chapter provides an overview of the aims, structure, and contents of the volume....
Much of the NP- vs. DP-debate has relied on largely conceptual and theory-internal arguments. In thi...
In most grammatical models, hierarchical structuring and dependencies are considered as central feat...
Contains fulltext : 3884.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
This paper considers and compares the status of the concept of head within different grammatical fra...
It is widely attested, cross-linguistically, for both words and prosodic morphemes to be required to...
International audienceWe question here the modalities of the relationship between an abstract struct...