Add to ORKGnone1noIn earlier works, we used Defeasible Logic to argue that techniques from belief and base revision encounter a number of difficulties in modelling legal dynamics. In particular, we showed that these techniques are not suitable when legal changes are retroactive. This suggested to adopt a different logical model able to express two main timelines, one internal to a given temporal version of the legal system, and another relative to how the legal system evolves over time. In this paper, we adjust our view and show that, under some restrictions, ideas from base revision, if applied to Defeasible Logic or to similar rule-based systems, can indeed capture some significant aspects of annulments, abrogations, and derogations.noneA. Rot...
none1noThis contribution provides a survey of a formal machinery I developed elsewhere with other co...
none3In this paper we briefly present an efficient implementation of temporal defeasible logic, and ...
Abstract. We propose a systematic investigation on how to modify a preference relation in a defeasib...
In earlier works, we used Defeasible Logic to argue that techniques from belief and base revision e...
In this paper we investigate how to represent and reason about legal abrogations and annulments in D...
In this paper we propose a temporal extension of Defeasible Logic to model legal modifications, suc...
In this paper we investigate how to model legal abrogation and annulment in Defeasible Logic. We exa...
none2siLegal dynamics is an important aspect of legal reasoning that inspired the area of belief rev...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificatio...
In order to properly model norm change in the law, temporal aspects of legal dynamics must be consid...
This paper proposes some variants of Temporal Defeasible Logic (TDL) to reason about normative modif...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificatio...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificati...
none5This paper proposes some variants of Temporal Defeasible Logic (TDL) to reason about normative ...
none1noThis contribution provides a survey of a formal machinery I developed elsewhere with other co...
none3In this paper we briefly present an efficient implementation of temporal defeasible logic, and ...
Abstract. We propose a systematic investigation on how to modify a preference relation in a defeasib...
In earlier works, we used Defeasible Logic to argue that techniques from belief and base revision e...
In this paper we investigate how to represent and reason about legal abrogations and annulments in D...
In this paper we propose a temporal extension of Defeasible Logic to model legal modifications, suc...
In this paper we investigate how to model legal abrogation and annulment in Defeasible Logic. We exa...
none2siLegal dynamics is an important aspect of legal reasoning that inspired the area of belief rev...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificatio...
In order to properly model norm change in the law, temporal aspects of legal dynamics must be consid...
This paper proposes some variants of Temporal Defeasible Logic (TDL) to reason about normative modif...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificatio...
This paper proposes a framework based on Defeasible Logic (DL) to reason about normative modificati...
none5This paper proposes some variants of Temporal Defeasible Logic (TDL) to reason about normative ...
none1noThis contribution provides a survey of a formal machinery I developed elsewhere with other co...
none3In this paper we briefly present an efficient implementation of temporal defeasible logic, and ...
Abstract. We propose a systematic investigation on how to modify a preference relation in a defeasib...