Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to generalize the theory of choice under uncertainty. The basic assumption is to summarize any probability distribution into its moments, so that preferences over distributions can be mapped into preferences over vectors of moments. This implies that ‘uncertain prospects’ (assets, portfolios, lotteries etc.), like Lancaster’s (1966) consumption goods, are bundles of characteristics, and can be directly priced, at the margin, in terms of their moments. The ‘independece axiom’ and expected utility are not required and St. Petersburg’s, Allais’s and other paradoxes may easily be solved
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to genera...
none2Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to g...
none2Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory o...
Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory of ass...
Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory of ass...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Abstract: After Tobin (1958), a considerable effort has been devoted to connecting the expected util...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to genera...
none2Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to g...
none2Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory o...
Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory of ass...
Starting from Tobin (1958) a utility functions of moments is proposed as a basis for a theory of ass...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
We propose the theoretical foundation of an ordinal utility function of moments, representing ration...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Abstract: After Tobin (1958), a considerable effort has been devoted to connecting the expected util...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
Using an ordinal approach to utility, in the spirit of Hicks (1962, 1967a), it is possible to greatl...
This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant...