Pitfalls and advantages of different strategies for the absolute quantification of N-acetyl aspartate, creatine and choline in white and grey matter by 1H-MRS.

This study extensively investigates different strategies for the absolute quantitation of N-acetyl aspartate, creatine and choline in white and grey matter by (1)H-MRS at 1.5 T. The main focus of this study was to reliably estimate metabolite concentrations while reducing the scan time, which remains as one of the main problems in clinical MRS. Absolute quantitation was based on the water-unsuppressed concentration as the internal standard. We compared strategies based on various experimental protocols and post-processing strategies. Data were obtained from 30 control subjects using a PRESS sequence at several TE to estimate the transverse relaxation time, T(2), of the metabolites. Quantitation was performed with the algorithm QUEST using two different metabolite signal basis sets: a whole-metabolite basis set (WhoM) and a basis set in which the singlet signals were split from the coupled signals (MSM). The basis sets were simulated in vivo for each TE used. Metabolites' T(2)s were then determined by fitting the estimated signal amplitudes of the metabolites obtained at different TEs. Then the absolute concentrations (mM) of the metabolites were assessed for each subject using the estimated signal amplitudes and either the mean estimated relaxation times of all subjects (mean protocol, MP) or the T(2) estimated from the spectra derived from the same subject (individual protocol, IP). Results showed that MP represents a less time-consuming alternative to IP in the quantitation of brain metabolites by (1)H-MRS in both grey and white matter, with a comparable accuracy when performed by MSM. It was also shown that the acquisition time might be further reduced by using a variant of MP, although with reduced accuracy. In this variant, only one water-suppressed and one water-unsuppressed spectra were acquired, drastically reducing the duration of the entire MRS examination. However, statistical analysis highlights the reduced accuracy of MP when performed using WhoM, particularly at longer echo times