Rasmusen et al. (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000) show that an incumbent monopolist might exclude entry of a more efficient competitor, by exploiting externalities among buyers. We show that their results hold only when downstream competition among buyers does not exist or is weak enough. Under fierce downstream competition, the incumbent cannot compensate a deviant buyer who buys from the more efficient entrant. Any such buyer will become more competitive and increase his output - thus triggering entry - and profits at the expense of buyers who sign an exclusive deal with the incumbent. Hence, exclusive deals cannot deter efficient entry
This article unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been r...
Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral eff...
Abstract. I reconcile a disagreement in the literature regarding the impact of downstream price comp...
Rasmusen et al. (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000) show that an incumbent monopolist might exclude...
Rasmusen et al. (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000) show that an incumbent monopolist might exclude...
The current literature shows that an incumbent monopolist might prevent entry of a more efficient ri...
A seminal work by Fumagalli and Motta (2006) explored that an incumbent manufacturer cannot deter an...
We extend the literature on exclusive dealing by allowing the incumbent and the potential entrant to...
This paper explores the ability of an incumbent to use exclusive deals or introductory offers to dom...
This article shows that buyers' coordination failures might prevent entry in an industry with an inc...
This paper shows that buyers’ coordination failures might prevent entry in an industry with an incum...
This paper examines the effects of exclusive dealing contracts in a simple model with manufacturers-...
We model exclusive dealing when the incumbent and potential entrant offer differentiated products an...
This study constructs a simplest model to examine anticompetitive exclusive contracts that prevent a...
Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral eff...
This article unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been r...
Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral eff...
Abstract. I reconcile a disagreement in the literature regarding the impact of downstream price comp...
Rasmusen et al. (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000) show that an incumbent monopolist might exclude...
Rasmusen et al. (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000) show that an incumbent monopolist might exclude...
The current literature shows that an incumbent monopolist might prevent entry of a more efficient ri...
A seminal work by Fumagalli and Motta (2006) explored that an incumbent manufacturer cannot deter an...
We extend the literature on exclusive dealing by allowing the incumbent and the potential entrant to...
This paper explores the ability of an incumbent to use exclusive deals or introductory offers to dom...
This article shows that buyers' coordination failures might prevent entry in an industry with an inc...
This paper shows that buyers’ coordination failures might prevent entry in an industry with an incum...
This paper examines the effects of exclusive dealing contracts in a simple model with manufacturers-...
We model exclusive dealing when the incumbent and potential entrant offer differentiated products an...
This study constructs a simplest model to examine anticompetitive exclusive contracts that prevent a...
Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral eff...
This article unifies various approaches to the analysis of exclusive dealing that so far have been r...
Antitrust scholars have argued that exclusive contracts have anticompetitive, or at best neutral eff...
Abstract. I reconcile a disagreement in the literature regarding the impact of downstream price comp...