Add to ORKGWe study media coverage of the 2009 MPs' expenses scandal by using a difference-in-differences methodology which is closely related to previous research on the US press of Larcinese et al. (2011) and Puglisi and Snyder (2011a). Our conclusion is that personal characteristics explain press coverage, ceteris paribus, better than partisan affiliation. In particular, we uncover a systematic unfavourable treatment of female MPs
We study the effect of competition on media bias in the context of US newspapers in the period 1870-...
In Belgium, like in numerous other democracies, the representation of women in parliament has risen ...
Do the media cover men and women politicians and candidates differently? This article performs a sys...
We study media coverage of the 2009 MPs' expenses scandal by using a difference-in-differences metho...
To see whether UK media coverage during the MPs’ expenses scandal followed partisan newspaper orient...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? The UK expenses scandal of May 2009 constitutes an ide...
In May 2009, revelations by The Telegraph on MPs’ expenses triggered one of the biggest scandals in ...
∗We thank John Lovett and Mike Naber for their valuable research assistance at different stages of t...
We analyze the coverage of U.S. political scandals by U.S. newspapers during the past decade. Using ...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? And which role does information play in the accountabil...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? And which role does information play in the accountabil...
This file was last viewed in Adobe Reader XMedia coverage is of central importance in determining ho...
We study the coverage of U.S. political scandals by U.S. newspapers during the past decade. Using au...
A study by Valentino Larcinese examines the channels through which voters keep politicians accountab...
This article explores British television news coverage of the 2009 MPs expenses scandal as part of a...
We study the effect of competition on media bias in the context of US newspapers in the period 1870-...
In Belgium, like in numerous other democracies, the representation of women in parliament has risen ...
Do the media cover men and women politicians and candidates differently? This article performs a sys...
We study media coverage of the 2009 MPs' expenses scandal by using a difference-in-differences metho...
To see whether UK media coverage during the MPs’ expenses scandal followed partisan newspaper orient...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? The UK expenses scandal of May 2009 constitutes an ide...
In May 2009, revelations by The Telegraph on MPs’ expenses triggered one of the biggest scandals in ...
∗We thank John Lovett and Mike Naber for their valuable research assistance at different stages of t...
We analyze the coverage of U.S. political scandals by U.S. newspapers during the past decade. Using ...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? And which role does information play in the accountabil...
Does democracy make politicians accountable? And which role does information play in the accountabil...
This file was last viewed in Adobe Reader XMedia coverage is of central importance in determining ho...
We study the coverage of U.S. political scandals by U.S. newspapers during the past decade. Using au...
A study by Valentino Larcinese examines the channels through which voters keep politicians accountab...
This article explores British television news coverage of the 2009 MPs expenses scandal as part of a...
We study the effect of competition on media bias in the context of US newspapers in the period 1870-...
In Belgium, like in numerous other democracies, the representation of women in parliament has risen ...
Do the media cover men and women politicians and candidates differently? This article performs a sys...