Throughout the twentieth century, prominent legal thinkers confidently predicted that law as it has been practiced in the West for centuries was archaic and doomed to imminent extinction. Why did they think this, and why were they wrong? And why was legal indeterminacy such a source of anxiety to twentieth-century legal thinkers? This essay, given as a lecture at Notre Dame, suggests that the recurring predictions of law\u27s demise and the pervasive angst about indeterminacy were manifestations of debilitating limitations in the philosophical framework within which twentieth-century thinkers understood law (and much else)
This paper applies Jacques Lacan\u27s theory of retrospective cause to the jurisprudence of H.L.A. H...
Stuart Banner’s The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and Why They ...
Of the various subjects of legal study, jurisprudence is the one in which the most momentous and pro...
Throughout the twentieth century, prominent legal thinkers confidently predicted that law as it has ...
One of the striking developments in academic law in the past half century is the reconception of law...
This essay argues that a defining characteristic of modern law – the distinctive way in which it jud...
This Essay presents law’s evolution as a paradoxical union of the finite and the infinite. At any gi...
During a five day period in June, 1992, every Justice on the United States Supreme Court joined one ...
Critical legal scholarship challenges the liberal claim that modern western societies are characteri...
The 1970s were an exciting and unusual time for legal education in America. The period was marked by...
This is the last sentence of Steven Smith\u27s elegant book, Law\u27s Quandary: [I]n the meantime.....
This essay is an advanced draft of work that will be published in On Philosophy and American Law (Fr...
My Essay is a response to legal realism, to its well-known arguments against rules of law. Legal r...
The Death of the Law?, conceived in 1985, and delivered at Cornell the next year, addressed the two ...
Published as Chapter 18 in Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought, Justin Desautels-Stein & Christ...
This paper applies Jacques Lacan\u27s theory of retrospective cause to the jurisprudence of H.L.A. H...
Stuart Banner’s The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and Why They ...
Of the various subjects of legal study, jurisprudence is the one in which the most momentous and pro...
Throughout the twentieth century, prominent legal thinkers confidently predicted that law as it has ...
One of the striking developments in academic law in the past half century is the reconception of law...
This essay argues that a defining characteristic of modern law – the distinctive way in which it jud...
This Essay presents law’s evolution as a paradoxical union of the finite and the infinite. At any gi...
During a five day period in June, 1992, every Justice on the United States Supreme Court joined one ...
Critical legal scholarship challenges the liberal claim that modern western societies are characteri...
The 1970s were an exciting and unusual time for legal education in America. The period was marked by...
This is the last sentence of Steven Smith\u27s elegant book, Law\u27s Quandary: [I]n the meantime.....
This essay is an advanced draft of work that will be published in On Philosophy and American Law (Fr...
My Essay is a response to legal realism, to its well-known arguments against rules of law. Legal r...
The Death of the Law?, conceived in 1985, and delivered at Cornell the next year, addressed the two ...
Published as Chapter 18 in Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought, Justin Desautels-Stein & Christ...
This paper applies Jacques Lacan\u27s theory of retrospective cause to the jurisprudence of H.L.A. H...
Stuart Banner’s The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and Why They ...
Of the various subjects of legal study, jurisprudence is the one in which the most momentous and pro...