Focal Hepatic Lesions: Detection and Characterization with Combination Gadolinium- and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide–enhanced MR Imaging

PURPOSE: To compare gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions when different contrast agent administration sequences are used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced, and SPIO-enhanced hepatic MR images were obtained in 134 patients. SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was performed immediately after gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in 50 patients, 1 day after gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in 40 patients, and before gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging in 44 patients. Two radiologists independently reviewed the gadolinium image set (unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images) and the SPIO image set (unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MR images) in random order. Lesion detection sensitivity and lesion characterization accuracy were compared by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az). RESULTS: Overall lesion detection accuracy for pooled data was significantly higher with the SPIO set (Az = 0.903) than with the gadolinium set (Az = 0.857) (P <.05). When hypovascular lesions were excluded, the detection rate was similar with the two sets. When hepatocellular carcinomas were excluded, the detection rate was significantly higher with the SPIO set (P <.01). Readers were more accurate in differentiating benign from malignant lesions with the gadolinium set (Az = 0.915) than with the SPIO set (Az = 0.847) (P <.01). Detection accuracy tended to be better with the images obtained after the second contrast agent was used. CONCLUSION: Hypovascular lesion detection was better with SPIO-enhanced MR images than with gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Detection and characterization of hypervascular lesions were improved with gadolinium-enhanced MR images.ope