In a well-known discussion between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze from 1972 on the relationship between intellectuals and power, Foucault states that the intellectual’s traditional task has been to say the truth to those who haven’t seen it yet and to say the truth in the name of those who are not able to say it. Consequently “conscience and eloquence” are the traditional characteristics of the politicized intellectual. Against this characterization, Foucault argues that a change has happ..
If we adhere to Michel Foucault’s argument that modern societies are governed by disciplinary power,...
A certain notion of dialogue provides a useful perspective not only for reading Foucault, but unders...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investi...
In a well-known discussion between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze from 1972 on the relationship ...
"Is it possible to develop a debate on subjectivity without the familiar notions of the “mind,” “bo...
One of the fundamental issues in 20th century philosophy is of the nature of individual subjective e...
Responding to ongoing concerns that Michel Foucault’s influential governmentality analytics fail to ...
This dissertation traces the evolution of French views of subjectivity through three antagonistic pa...
The 'late' Foucault and his purported 'return to the subject' is a much discussed issue. Over the pa...
Deleuze closes his study of the shift in Foucault’s work from the archive to the diagram with a cons...
Expert discourses are often viewed, following Foucault, as the means of normalization and subjectifi...
Is the project of Michel Foucault built around an anti-normativ ethic and politics? If yes, which pr...
In his article, “On the Processes of Subjectivation as a Subspecies of the Event: the Deleuzian Read...
Does Bevir’s weak intentionalism clash irredeemably with the rejection of conceptions of subjectivit...
Foucault’s discussion of parrhēsia – frank speech – in his last two Collège de France lecture course...
If we adhere to Michel Foucault’s argument that modern societies are governed by disciplinary power,...
A certain notion of dialogue provides a useful perspective not only for reading Foucault, but unders...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investi...
In a well-known discussion between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze from 1972 on the relationship ...
"Is it possible to develop a debate on subjectivity without the familiar notions of the “mind,” “bo...
One of the fundamental issues in 20th century philosophy is of the nature of individual subjective e...
Responding to ongoing concerns that Michel Foucault’s influential governmentality analytics fail to ...
This dissertation traces the evolution of French views of subjectivity through three antagonistic pa...
The 'late' Foucault and his purported 'return to the subject' is a much discussed issue. Over the pa...
Deleuze closes his study of the shift in Foucault’s work from the archive to the diagram with a cons...
Expert discourses are often viewed, following Foucault, as the means of normalization and subjectifi...
Is the project of Michel Foucault built around an anti-normativ ethic and politics? If yes, which pr...
In his article, “On the Processes of Subjectivation as a Subspecies of the Event: the Deleuzian Read...
Does Bevir’s weak intentionalism clash irredeemably with the rejection of conceptions of subjectivit...
Foucault’s discussion of parrhēsia – frank speech – in his last two Collège de France lecture course...
If we adhere to Michel Foucault’s argument that modern societies are governed by disciplinary power,...
A certain notion of dialogue provides a useful perspective not only for reading Foucault, but unders...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investi...