ROUNDTABLE: Reviewing Books in a Changing Environment Session Participants: Discussant: Marie Anchordoguy (University of Washington) Discussant: Mary Elizabeth Berry (University of California, Berkeley) Discussant: Joya Chatterji (University of Cambridge) Discussant: Jennifer Schuessler (New York Times) Chair: Joanna Handlin Smith (Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies) Discussant: Jeffrey Wasserstrom (University of California, Irvine) Session Organizer: Joanna Handlin S..
Leading up to their tenure and promotion, junior faculty are often primarily concerned with followin...
Reimagining Peer Review. Critical Librarianship & Pedagogy Symposium, September 1-17, 2020, The Univ...
The temporality of books runs counter to many changes in academic employment and publishing. Books a...
PodcastThis week on The Missouri Review Soundbooth intern Joelle Jefferis leads a round table discus...
Round table discussion with curators, writers and artists on reading in relation to exhibition makin...
In this invitation lecture, I have shared my thoughts on how to review research literature for high ...
Photograph of five guest authors attending the 8th Annual Book Club Publisher's Luncheon Roundtable ...
Radical acts impel change, and the act of reading, perhaps more than any otherenterprise, has profou...
‘The Review and the Reviewer’ addresses the role of both the review and the reviewer within the wide...
Panel symposium presented at the 2019 Southern Management Association conference, Norfolk, VA. Progr...
This is a Review Symposium of the book by Peter Mayo and Paolo Vittoria, titled 'Critical Education ...
Academic criticism can be highly fraught and face threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed ...
This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book rev...
Summary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to...
Chairs: Khimen Cooper, Collin College; Searn Ferrier-Watson, Collin College; Susan Stewart, Texas A&...
Leading up to their tenure and promotion, junior faculty are often primarily concerned with followin...
Reimagining Peer Review. Critical Librarianship & Pedagogy Symposium, September 1-17, 2020, The Univ...
The temporality of books runs counter to many changes in academic employment and publishing. Books a...
PodcastThis week on The Missouri Review Soundbooth intern Joelle Jefferis leads a round table discus...
Round table discussion with curators, writers and artists on reading in relation to exhibition makin...
In this invitation lecture, I have shared my thoughts on how to review research literature for high ...
Photograph of five guest authors attending the 8th Annual Book Club Publisher's Luncheon Roundtable ...
Radical acts impel change, and the act of reading, perhaps more than any otherenterprise, has profou...
‘The Review and the Reviewer’ addresses the role of both the review and the reviewer within the wide...
Panel symposium presented at the 2019 Southern Management Association conference, Norfolk, VA. Progr...
This is a Review Symposium of the book by Peter Mayo and Paolo Vittoria, titled 'Critical Education ...
Academic criticism can be highly fraught and face threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed ...
This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book rev...
Summary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to...
Chairs: Khimen Cooper, Collin College; Searn Ferrier-Watson, Collin College; Susan Stewart, Texas A&...
Leading up to their tenure and promotion, junior faculty are often primarily concerned with followin...
Reimagining Peer Review. Critical Librarianship & Pedagogy Symposium, September 1-17, 2020, The Univ...
The temporality of books runs counter to many changes in academic employment and publishing. Books a...