Beginning from Sosa’s (1999) safety condition on knowledge, I engage with Comesaña’s (2005) example of unsafe knowledge. I propose a modified safety condition, test it against examples, and respond to a series of objections. I argue that, while further modifications may be required, it is plausible that (some version of) safety is a necessary condition on knowledge. 0.1 My purpose in this chapter is to (begin to) defend safety as a necessary condition on knowledge. First, I introduce Ernest S..
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could ...
In this paper I will offer a comprehensive defense of the safety account of knowledge against counte...
28.08.2009- draft, please do not quote. Comments welcome. Timothy Williamson (1992, 224–5) and Ernes...
This paper raises a problem for so-called safety-based conceptions of knowledge: It is argued that n...
This paper raises a problem for so-called safetybased conceptions of knowledge: It is argued that n...
Many contemporary epistemologists hold that a subject S’s true belief that p counts as knowledge onl...
Despite the substantial appeal of the safety condition, Kelp (J Philos Res 34:21–31, 2009; Am Philos...
This paper introduces a new argument for the safety condition on knowledge. It is based on the cont...
In this final chapter, I bring epistemology to the practical domain of law. As Comesaña (2005) prese...
Throughout the years, Sosa has taken different views on the safety condition on knowledge. In his ea...
The safety condition on knowledge, in the spirit of anti-luck epistemology, has become one of the mo...
Safety purports to explain why cases of accidentally true belief are not knowledge, addressing Getti...
An influential proposal is that knowledge involves safe belief. A belief is safe, in the relevant se...
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could ...
In this paper I will offer a comprehensive defense of the safety account of knowledge against counte...
28.08.2009- draft, please do not quote. Comments welcome. Timothy Williamson (1992, 224–5) and Ernes...
This paper raises a problem for so-called safety-based conceptions of knowledge: It is argued that n...
This paper raises a problem for so-called safetybased conceptions of knowledge: It is argued that n...
Many contemporary epistemologists hold that a subject S’s true belief that p counts as knowledge onl...
Despite the substantial appeal of the safety condition, Kelp (J Philos Res 34:21–31, 2009; Am Philos...
This paper introduces a new argument for the safety condition on knowledge. It is based on the cont...
In this final chapter, I bring epistemology to the practical domain of law. As Comesaña (2005) prese...
Throughout the years, Sosa has taken different views on the safety condition on knowledge. In his ea...
The safety condition on knowledge, in the spirit of anti-luck epistemology, has become one of the mo...
Safety purports to explain why cases of accidentally true belief are not knowledge, addressing Getti...
An influential proposal is that knowledge involves safe belief. A belief is safe, in the relevant se...
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could ...
In this paper I will offer a comprehensive defense of the safety account of knowledge against counte...
28.08.2009- draft, please do not quote. Comments welcome. Timothy Williamson (1992, 224–5) and Ernes...