Not much of the editorial process of creating digital scholarly editions is automated or assisted by computer tools. Existing tools are hard to combine in a coherent workflow. This paper discusses several challenges of collaborative editorial projects dealing with many manuscript witnesses and proposes the adoption of a shared formalization describing the editorial process. The use of a shared formalization will allow the whole editorial process to be semi-automated, with positive repercussions on the workload of the editors and on the quality and verifiability of the edition itself
The “usefulness” of a critical apparatus depends both on the editor's judgment of what to include or...
The present paper aims to contribute to the discussion about a) the complementary information in an ...
The present article is centered on the recent developments of the collaborative project 7PartidasDig...
Not much of the editorial process of creating digital scholarly editions is automated or assisted by...
This book provides an up-to-date, coherent and comprehensive treatment of digital scholarly editing,...
International audienceIn the frame of Digital Humanities, many collaborative scholarly publishing pr...
The emerging field of Digital Scholarly Editing, concerned with the application of the digital parad...
Critical editions can be complex objects to digitise both in the output/publication process and in t...
The essay describes and reflects on the changes and transformations induced in scholarly editorial p...
What are the consequences for data modelling when we think of critical edition not as a document, bu...
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
While collaboration on documents has been supported for several decades by a variety of systems and ...
Digital scholarly editing is a relatively new field within philology and textual criticism, where se...
This paper deals with editing tools and editing platforms, i.e. programs used by editors in order to...
The “usefulness” of a critical apparatus depends both on the editor's judgment of what to include or...
The present paper aims to contribute to the discussion about a) the complementary information in an ...
The present article is centered on the recent developments of the collaborative project 7PartidasDig...
Not much of the editorial process of creating digital scholarly editions is automated or assisted by...
This book provides an up-to-date, coherent and comprehensive treatment of digital scholarly editing,...
International audienceIn the frame of Digital Humanities, many collaborative scholarly publishing pr...
The emerging field of Digital Scholarly Editing, concerned with the application of the digital parad...
Critical editions can be complex objects to digitise both in the output/publication process and in t...
The essay describes and reflects on the changes and transformations induced in scholarly editorial p...
What are the consequences for data modelling when we think of critical edition not as a document, bu...
This volume presents the state of the art in digital scholarly editing. Drawing together the work of...
Scholarly editing and textual digitisation are typically seen as two distinct, though related, fiel...
While collaboration on documents has been supported for several decades by a variety of systems and ...
Digital scholarly editing is a relatively new field within philology and textual criticism, where se...
This paper deals with editing tools and editing platforms, i.e. programs used by editors in order to...
The “usefulness” of a critical apparatus depends both on the editor's judgment of what to include or...
The present paper aims to contribute to the discussion about a) the complementary information in an ...
The present article is centered on the recent developments of the collaborative project 7PartidasDig...