This article reports on the 2010 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES) and introduces the CHES trend file, which contains measures of national party positioning on European integration, ideology and several European Union (EU) and non-EU policies for 1999-2010. We examine the reliability of expert judgments and cross-validate the 2010 CHES data with data from the Comparative Manifesto Project and the 2009 European Elections Studies survey, and explore basic trends on party positioning since 1999. The dataset is available at the CHES website
Publication based on research carried out in the framework of the European Union Democracy Observato...
Expert surveys are a valuable, commonly used instrument to measure party positions. Some critics que...
This article presents a new method for estimating positions of political parties across country- and...
This article reports on the 2010 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES) and introduces the CHES trend fil...
This article reports on the 2010 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES) and introduces the CHES trend fil...
Research on party competition and political representation relies on valid cross-national measures o...
2 data files, 1 documentation fileThe Chapel Hill expert surveys estimate party positioning on Europ...
This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure nat...
The Chapel Hill expert surveys estimate party positioning on European integration, ideology and poli...
This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure nat...
Published online: 28 Sep 2021Existing research on political parties’ policy positions has traditiona...
Expert surveys have been subject to a number of criticisms concerning their ability to produce accur...
This paper is intended to frame and describe a novel method of political party positioning within th...
The EUENGAGE Dataset collects data from the EUENGAGE Project, which ran from 2015 to 2018. For more ...
First published online: 02 July 2020This data article provides a descriptive overview of the “EU Pro...
Publication based on research carried out in the framework of the European Union Democracy Observato...
Expert surveys are a valuable, commonly used instrument to measure party positions. Some critics que...
This article presents a new method for estimating positions of political parties across country- and...
This article reports on the 2010 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES) and introduces the CHES trend fil...
This article reports on the 2010 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES) and introduces the CHES trend fil...
Research on party competition and political representation relies on valid cross-national measures o...
2 data files, 1 documentation fileThe Chapel Hill expert surveys estimate party positioning on Europ...
This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure nat...
The Chapel Hill expert surveys estimate party positioning on European integration, ideology and poli...
This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure nat...
Published online: 28 Sep 2021Existing research on political parties’ policy positions has traditiona...
Expert surveys have been subject to a number of criticisms concerning their ability to produce accur...
This paper is intended to frame and describe a novel method of political party positioning within th...
The EUENGAGE Dataset collects data from the EUENGAGE Project, which ran from 2015 to 2018. For more ...
First published online: 02 July 2020This data article provides a descriptive overview of the “EU Pro...
Publication based on research carried out in the framework of the European Union Democracy Observato...
Expert surveys are a valuable, commonly used instrument to measure party positions. Some critics que...
This article presents a new method for estimating positions of political parties across country- and...