Criminal convictions often result in a restriction on the defendant’s freedom and a deprivation of the defendant’s liberty. Given the gravity of these consequences, there are multiple procedures the court must follow not only in determining guilt but also in imposing a sentence. Sentencing ranges are an essential component of criminal law. In Missouri, sentencing ranges are found in statutes, and these statutes help trial judges determine what sentence to impose. Unfortunately, these guidelines can be incorrectly applied. If these errors are not addressed at the trial level, the appellate process can provide relief. However, interesting questions arise when the error is not preserved and courts are required to apply plain error review inste...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
Federal courts disfavor granting collateral relief from final criminal judgments. This mentality is ...
United States v. Booker held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( Guidelines ), as they were app...
Criminal convictions often result in a restriction on the defendant’s freedom and a deprivation of t...
Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, criminal sentences were rarely appealed. For the first t...
Normally, if a defendant fails to make a timely objection to a perceived error during trial, he forf...
The legal standards for reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are unde...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Conventional wisdom provides that a criminal defendant who apologizes for wrongful actions committed...
Guilty pleas have come to resolve all but a fraction of federal criminal cases. So for most federal ...
There is no such thing as a low-stakes misdemeanor. The misdemeanor sentence itself, which can range...
This article analyzes the enforceability of appeal-of-sentence waivers in terms of due process and p...
Career offender sentencing enhancements present difficult questions for courts. One of the most diff...
Since 1986, the country has been witness to a revolution in federal sentencing practice: indetermina...
Unlike in most areas of the law, federal courts of appeals in the United States defer to trial court...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
Federal courts disfavor granting collateral relief from final criminal judgments. This mentality is ...
United States v. Booker held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( Guidelines ), as they were app...
Criminal convictions often result in a restriction on the defendant’s freedom and a deprivation of t...
Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, criminal sentences were rarely appealed. For the first t...
Normally, if a defendant fails to make a timely objection to a perceived error during trial, he forf...
The legal standards for reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing are unde...
On appeal, an essential question in reviewing a constitutional error in a criminal trial is whether ...
Conventional wisdom provides that a criminal defendant who apologizes for wrongful actions committed...
Guilty pleas have come to resolve all but a fraction of federal criminal cases. So for most federal ...
There is no such thing as a low-stakes misdemeanor. The misdemeanor sentence itself, which can range...
This article analyzes the enforceability of appeal-of-sentence waivers in terms of due process and p...
Career offender sentencing enhancements present difficult questions for courts. One of the most diff...
Since 1986, the country has been witness to a revolution in federal sentencing practice: indetermina...
Unlike in most areas of the law, federal courts of appeals in the United States defer to trial court...
Appellate harmless error review, an early twentieth-century innovation prompted by concerns of effic...
Federal courts disfavor granting collateral relief from final criminal judgments. This mentality is ...
United States v. Booker held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ( Guidelines ), as they were app...