In Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Association, the California Supreme Court ruled that a lender may not automatically enforce a due-on-sale clause when a trustor-obligor enters into an installment sale contract with a third party. The author discusses the Tucker decision and its impact on the future use of the due-on-sale clause in California, arguing that the Tucker test has broad applicability
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
In a recent case the California Supreme Court had occasion to consider the effect of the California ...
This Comment examines the validity of the prepayment clause, in light of the Wellenkamp v. Bank of A...
The author examines the history of due-on-sale clauses, tracing its treatment in the Supreme Court o...
Faced with an issue of first impression in Nebraska and a confusing body of law from other states, t...
The California Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Wellenkamp is considered by many to be one of t...
Use of the due-on-sale clause to trigger rate adjustments, a relatively recent innovation, has been ...
The due-on-sale clause is a mortgage provision that affords the mortgagee the right to accelerate th...
This Note suggests that courts have failed to articulate properly the relation of the due-on-sale cl...
The purpose of this article is to identify and examine the influencing considerations and the attach...
This article discusses a California Supreme Court case which held that a lender may nonjudicially fo...
This Comment examines the unresolved issues that have survived the passage of the Garn-St. Germain D...
This article discusses a California case dealing with lender postponement and reinstatement issu...
Section 580b of the California Code of Civil Procedure makes purchase-money deeds of trust in Califo...
Contemporary lenders presently utilize at least two types of clauses in a security instrument (mortg...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
In a recent case the California Supreme Court had occasion to consider the effect of the California ...
This Comment examines the validity of the prepayment clause, in light of the Wellenkamp v. Bank of A...
The author examines the history of due-on-sale clauses, tracing its treatment in the Supreme Court o...
Faced with an issue of first impression in Nebraska and a confusing body of law from other states, t...
The California Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Wellenkamp is considered by many to be one of t...
Use of the due-on-sale clause to trigger rate adjustments, a relatively recent innovation, has been ...
The due-on-sale clause is a mortgage provision that affords the mortgagee the right to accelerate th...
This Note suggests that courts have failed to articulate properly the relation of the due-on-sale cl...
The purpose of this article is to identify and examine the influencing considerations and the attach...
This article discusses a California Supreme Court case which held that a lender may nonjudicially fo...
This Comment examines the unresolved issues that have survived the passage of the Garn-St. Germain D...
This article discusses a California case dealing with lender postponement and reinstatement issu...
Section 580b of the California Code of Civil Procedure makes purchase-money deeds of trust in Califo...
Contemporary lenders presently utilize at least two types of clauses in a security instrument (mortg...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
In a recent case the California Supreme Court had occasion to consider the effect of the California ...
This Comment examines the validity of the prepayment clause, in light of the Wellenkamp v. Bank of A...