In City of San Jose v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court incorporated the class certification provision of Rule 23(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure into California class action practice. The author examines how -the federal courts have construed Rule 23(c) (1), analyzes the practical aspects and underlying policy issues of the class determination, and suggests a method of procedure for California trial courts in light of this recent supreme court directive
This Comment traces the evolution of class actions in California, from 1850 to the present. The prog...
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23,...
This Article focuses on class actions in the Washington State courts. It compares and contrasts the ...
A district court has broad discretion in deciding whether a suit may be maintained as a class action...
The captioned parties to proposed class action lawsuits often settle before the court certifies the ...
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is home to the class action device. It is well-docum...
The 1966 amendment of Rule 23 provided plaintiffs with an extremely powerful procedural device. Sinc...
The modern class action is a litigation superstar. The device’s potential for opening the courthouse...
Over roughly the past fifteen years, the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have limited access ...
Written for those upper-level law students who intend to practice law in California, this casebook e...
This Note argues that a Rule 23 class action offers the best way to manage multiple actions for puni...
This Article is the first to take a hard look at Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4)(B), an oft...
This Note explores California\u27s Unfair Competition Law and critiques how courts have applied the ...
On April 16, 2015, in Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit articula...
An ever-increasing number of courts and commentators have advocated a simple solution to the seeming...
This Comment traces the evolution of class actions in California, from 1850 to the present. The prog...
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23,...
This Article focuses on class actions in the Washington State courts. It compares and contrasts the ...
A district court has broad discretion in deciding whether a suit may be maintained as a class action...
The captioned parties to proposed class action lawsuits often settle before the court certifies the ...
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is home to the class action device. It is well-docum...
The 1966 amendment of Rule 23 provided plaintiffs with an extremely powerful procedural device. Sinc...
The modern class action is a litigation superstar. The device’s potential for opening the courthouse...
Over roughly the past fifteen years, the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have limited access ...
Written for those upper-level law students who intend to practice law in California, this casebook e...
This Note argues that a Rule 23 class action offers the best way to manage multiple actions for puni...
This Article is the first to take a hard look at Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4)(B), an oft...
This Note explores California\u27s Unfair Competition Law and critiques how courts have applied the ...
On April 16, 2015, in Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit articula...
An ever-increasing number of courts and commentators have advocated a simple solution to the seeming...
This Comment traces the evolution of class actions in California, from 1850 to the present. The prog...
This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23,...
This Article focuses on class actions in the Washington State courts. It compares and contrasts the ...