Procedural rulemaking is often thought of as a second-order task for the federal court system, relevant to the courts’ work but not essential to their function. In reality, rulemaking plays an integral role in the court system’s operation by actively insulating the courts from environmental pressure. This Article explains how power over procedural rulemaking protects the federal courts from environmental uncertainty and describes the court system’s efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the rulemaking buffer in response to historical and contemporary challenges
This Article is a reflection on personal experience as well as an account of what has happened to th...
The two papers we have before us tell both descriptive and normative stories about current issues of...
The thesis of this Article is a simple one: Courts regularly engage in rulemaking of questionable co...
Procedural rulemaking is often thought of as a second-order task for the federal court system, relev...
This article assesses the current and likely impact of the Supreme Court\u27s federalism cases on fe...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
Debates about the common lawmaking power of the federal courts focus exclusively on substantive comm...
Debates about the common lawmaking power of the federal courts focus exclusively on substantive comm...
What is the proper role of rules in federal courts law? Some scholars associated with the Legal Proc...
What is the proper role of rules in federal courts law? Some scholars associated with the Legal Proc...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
This Article examines the long-standing conflict between Rule 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
As we wrote last year, the U.S. Supreme Court has shown considerable interest during the past decade...
This Article is a reflection on personal experience as well as an account of what has happened to th...
The two papers we have before us tell both descriptive and normative stories about current issues of...
The thesis of this Article is a simple one: Courts regularly engage in rulemaking of questionable co...
Procedural rulemaking is often thought of as a second-order task for the federal court system, relev...
This article assesses the current and likely impact of the Supreme Court\u27s federalism cases on fe...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The proper role of the courts in our system of ...
Debates about the common lawmaking power of the federal courts focus exclusively on substantive comm...
Debates about the common lawmaking power of the federal courts focus exclusively on substantive comm...
What is the proper role of rules in federal courts law? Some scholars associated with the Legal Proc...
What is the proper role of rules in federal courts law? Some scholars associated with the Legal Proc...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
This Article examines the long-standing conflict between Rule 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
As we wrote last year, the U.S. Supreme Court has shown considerable interest during the past decade...
This Article is a reflection on personal experience as well as an account of what has happened to th...
The two papers we have before us tell both descriptive and normative stories about current issues of...
The thesis of this Article is a simple one: Courts regularly engage in rulemaking of questionable co...