In June 2017, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. Abbasi and held that prisoners unlawfully detained post-9/11 did not have a Bivens claim against policy-level federal executive branch officials and likely had no Bivens claim against the wardens at the facility where they were detained. In doing so, the Court drastically altered the analysis for deciding when a Bivens claim is new and for determining when a new Bivens claim should be either allowed by a court or precluded under a “special factors” analysis. This change in the Bivens framework severely restricts the availability of factually novel Bivens claims, even those based on constitutional rights whose violation have generally been found to provide a cause of action. The net result is...
During its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court developed a new retroactivity doctrine that, i...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Ziglar v. Abassi purported to clarify the role of the judi...
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes indivi...
In June 2017, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. Abbasi and held that prisoners unlawfully detained...
In Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843 (2017), the Supreme Court held that a proposed Bivens remedy wa...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Interpreting recent Supreme Court precedent, th...
In the 2012 case Minneci v. Pollard, the United States Supreme Court held that federal prisoners ass...
The Supreme Court has long recognized that prisoners\u27 constitutional rights must be balanced agai...
Introduction: In Bell v. Wolfish, the United States Supreme Court held that, with respect to conditi...
This report discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in "Ziglar v. Abbassi" and the "Bivens" remedy that...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012,...
Prior to the late 1960s, federal courts took a hands-off approach when inmates in state prisons trie...
Professor Preis discusses Minneci v. Pollard, a case he argued before the Supreme Court of the Unite...
The 2021 term of the Supreme Court of the United States produced two opinions significantly dampenin...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narco...
During its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court developed a new retroactivity doctrine that, i...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Ziglar v. Abassi purported to clarify the role of the judi...
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes indivi...
In June 2017, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. Abbasi and held that prisoners unlawfully detained...
In Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843 (2017), the Supreme Court held that a proposed Bivens remedy wa...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Interpreting recent Supreme Court precedent, th...
In the 2012 case Minneci v. Pollard, the United States Supreme Court held that federal prisoners ass...
The Supreme Court has long recognized that prisoners\u27 constitutional rights must be balanced agai...
Introduction: In Bell v. Wolfish, the United States Supreme Court held that, with respect to conditi...
This report discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in "Ziglar v. Abbassi" and the "Bivens" remedy that...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012,...
Prior to the late 1960s, federal courts took a hands-off approach when inmates in state prisons trie...
Professor Preis discusses Minneci v. Pollard, a case he argued before the Supreme Court of the Unite...
The 2021 term of the Supreme Court of the United States produced two opinions significantly dampenin...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narco...
During its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court developed a new retroactivity doctrine that, i...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Ziglar v. Abassi purported to clarify the role of the judi...
Section 1983 is the major enforcer of individual federal constitutional rights. It authorizes indivi...