This article briefly describes the history of jury courts and lay participation in various countries, and the inter-related political and procedural reasons for introducing lay participation. It specifically focuses on the introduction of lay participation in application to Japan’s new mixed court system
This introduction to the special issue of Oñati Socio-legal Series describes the goals of the confer...
This article discusses the two pillars of lay participation in the Japanese criminal justice system ...
The Japanese lay judge system heard its first case in May of 2009. Until that moment critics and pro...
This article briefly describes the history of jury courts and lay participation in various countries...
As juries in the U.S. and other parts of the world have increasingly come under attack, many countri...
This chapter examines the history of the interwar jury in Japan and the reasons for its lack of succ...
In 1999, major changes to Japan’s criminal justice system were proposed, and over the next 10 years,...
The Japanese seeking to involve their citizens in the judicial system as well establishing a check o...
With Japan marking its three-year anniversary of the lay judge system, now is an ideal time to asses...
The Authors introduce and critique Japan\u27s proposed quasi-jury or lay assessor system (saiban-in ...
Japan\u27s new mixed jury system (dubbed the saiban-in) is designed to democratize the criminal lega...
Lay judge, or “saiban-in” , courts try serious cases in Japan . Sitting together, professional judg...
Three years after Korea introduced the jury system for the first time in its history, and two years ...
This research focuses on a recent judicial reform measure proposed by the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan in...
In the late 1920s and 1930s Japan had a jury system. It was suspended in 1943 as a wartime measure,...
This introduction to the special issue of Oñati Socio-legal Series describes the goals of the confer...
This article discusses the two pillars of lay participation in the Japanese criminal justice system ...
The Japanese lay judge system heard its first case in May of 2009. Until that moment critics and pro...
This article briefly describes the history of jury courts and lay participation in various countries...
As juries in the U.S. and other parts of the world have increasingly come under attack, many countri...
This chapter examines the history of the interwar jury in Japan and the reasons for its lack of succ...
In 1999, major changes to Japan’s criminal justice system were proposed, and over the next 10 years,...
The Japanese seeking to involve their citizens in the judicial system as well establishing a check o...
With Japan marking its three-year anniversary of the lay judge system, now is an ideal time to asses...
The Authors introduce and critique Japan\u27s proposed quasi-jury or lay assessor system (saiban-in ...
Japan\u27s new mixed jury system (dubbed the saiban-in) is designed to democratize the criminal lega...
Lay judge, or “saiban-in” , courts try serious cases in Japan . Sitting together, professional judg...
Three years after Korea introduced the jury system for the first time in its history, and two years ...
This research focuses on a recent judicial reform measure proposed by the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan in...
In the late 1920s and 1930s Japan had a jury system. It was suspended in 1943 as a wartime measure,...
This introduction to the special issue of Oñati Socio-legal Series describes the goals of the confer...
This article discusses the two pillars of lay participation in the Japanese criminal justice system ...
The Japanese lay judge system heard its first case in May of 2009. Until that moment critics and pro...