From Guantanamo to Syria: The Extraterritorial Constitution in the Age of Extreme Vetting

This Article examines for the first time in scholarly literature whether and to what extent the Constitution applies extraterritorially to immigrants abroad. In particular, it explores whether non-detained immigrants and refugees outside the territorial boundaries of the United States can claim constitutional protection to challenge immigration policies and orders. The Supreme Court\u27s recent willingness to reconsider the limits of the political branches\u27 plenary power over immigration law and policy, coupled with the Court\u27s recent extension of the Constitution to certain classes of extraterritorial noncitizens, suggests that a future role may exist for extraterritorialj urisprudence to inform constitutional immigration law. Using the Trump Administration\u27s inchoate doctrine of extreme vetting as a case study, this Article explores how and in what circumstances the Court might make available avenues for constitutional challenge to immigrants residing abroad. It concludes by proposing a unified theory for extraterritorial constitutional immigration jurisprudence