Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholarship can have an enormous impact on the development of legal doctrine. This Article differs in two respects. First, it focuses not on a single seminal work, but rather on a developing literature authored by a large group of scholars. Second, it attempts to assess the impact of that literature not on the growth of legal theory, but on the development of a single legal institution-the United States Courts of Appeals
This study investigates the relevance of legal scholarship to courts in U.S. by examining the citati...
Lower court compliance with the superior courts is now a norm in the judicial system of the United S...
In Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and Willia...
Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholars...
While the United States Supreme Court has been the object of seemingly endless scholarly commentary,...
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opini...
The author notes the growing bureaucratization of appellate justice in the United States and, in par...
This Article begins with a modest objective and ends with an ambitious one. First, it asserts that a...
This edition promises to redefine the canon of the study of appellate courts, continuing the compreh...
Commentators have observed two apparent trends in the use of legal scholarship by the judiciary. Fir...
American administrative law is grounded in a conception of the relationship between reviewing courts...
This article deals with the limitations of judicial review and the possibilities of its augmentation...
The interrelationship between the United States Supreme Court and the Court of Military Appeals is n...
The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on...
Although the Supreme Court is a singular institution within the American judiciary, it remains recog...
This study investigates the relevance of legal scholarship to courts in U.S. by examining the citati...
Lower court compliance with the superior courts is now a norm in the judicial system of the United S...
In Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and Willia...
Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholars...
While the United States Supreme Court has been the object of seemingly endless scholarly commentary,...
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opini...
The author notes the growing bureaucratization of appellate justice in the United States and, in par...
This Article begins with a modest objective and ends with an ambitious one. First, it asserts that a...
This edition promises to redefine the canon of the study of appellate courts, continuing the compreh...
Commentators have observed two apparent trends in the use of legal scholarship by the judiciary. Fir...
American administrative law is grounded in a conception of the relationship between reviewing courts...
This article deals with the limitations of judicial review and the possibilities of its augmentation...
The interrelationship between the United States Supreme Court and the Court of Military Appeals is n...
The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on...
Although the Supreme Court is a singular institution within the American judiciary, it remains recog...
This study investigates the relevance of legal scholarship to courts in U.S. by examining the citati...
Lower court compliance with the superior courts is now a norm in the judicial system of the United S...
In Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and Willia...