Add to ORKGThis Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish access. Because reform of current law would be implemented largely at the judicial front lines -the 700-plus U.S. district judges\u27 courtrooms ---the concerns and desires of district judges are of primary importance to any proposed change. The survey documented an institutional resistance to an expanded media presence in federal courtrooms; this institutional inertia may be the strongest single reason that change has not occurred. Part I of this Note presents the federal rules, canons, and resolutions comprising the current prohibition against video and audio-equipment access, as well as case law illustrating an insistence upon maintaining se...
English and American common law have long recognized the public\u27s right of access to judicial rec...
Since the explosion of television broadcasts of high profile criminal trials began in 1994, controve...
With in-person hearings limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, many courts pivoted to proceedings hel...
This Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish acc...
Since the advent of film and video recording, society has enjoyed the ability to capture the lights ...
In spite of a communications revolution that has given the public access to new media in new places,...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Widespread electronic access to case files gives rise to security concerns previously unrealized in ...
Despite the pervasive integration of technology into various social institutions, one public body—th...
Today in most states, electronic coverage of court proceedings is permitted. States are classified a...
The Democracy Divide is meant to frame the issues in terms of the digital divide; however, unlike th...
The federal judiciary recently embraced the technological revolution. Select courts are now equipped...
Consumers have access to an ever increasing inventory of video content choices as a result of techno...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
English and American common law have long recognized the public\u27s right of access to judicial rec...
Since the explosion of television broadcasts of high profile criminal trials began in 1994, controve...
With in-person hearings limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, many courts pivoted to proceedings hel...
This Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish acc...
Since the advent of film and video recording, society has enjoyed the ability to capture the lights ...
In spite of a communications revolution that has given the public access to new media in new places,...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Widespread electronic access to case files gives rise to security concerns previously unrealized in ...
Despite the pervasive integration of technology into various social institutions, one public body—th...
Today in most states, electronic coverage of court proceedings is permitted. States are classified a...
The Democracy Divide is meant to frame the issues in terms of the digital divide; however, unlike th...
The federal judiciary recently embraced the technological revolution. Select courts are now equipped...
Consumers have access to an ever increasing inventory of video content choices as a result of techno...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
English and American common law have long recognized the public\u27s right of access to judicial rec...
Since the explosion of television broadcasts of high profile criminal trials began in 1994, controve...
With in-person hearings limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, many courts pivoted to proceedings hel...