Add to ORKGOn the evening of Thursday, April 7, students gathered to attend a panel on Judicial Activism at the Columbus School of Law. The panelists discussed how their backgrounds influence judicial discretion, what judicial activism means to them, and why it is important to have diversity on the bench. “It is so important to have diversity on the bench because you see all pieces and you can address all pieces,” Hall Johnson said. “That is part of why our system is so good.” A summary of the event is available here
On November 4, 2019, Catholic Law’s American Constitution Society (ACS) hosted an evening lecture en...
This article addresses the compelling interest states have in the educational benefit of diversity i...
This article evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appe...
Monday, March 4, 2013 Georgia Law was featured in the Daily Report regarding a panel discussion held...
The lack of racial diversity on our nation’s courts threatens both the quality and legitimacy of jud...
This Article concludes that political dialogue engendered by controversial minority judicial nominat...
Prof. Robert Butkin introduces the first panel of the day, Judicial Activism v. Judicial Restraint
According to the most recent report of The New York Judicial Committee on Women in the Courts, publi...
Part I of this Article considers the different voices and perspectives added to the judiciary by the...
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether diversity is...
For five minority judges who hold leadership positions in the judiciary, one of the great benefits ...
Assistant Professor Anne Mullins recently attended a judicial panel hosted by the University of Chic...
As is evident from these articles, the question of judicial diversity is far more complex and nuance...
Twice in the past two years, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved educational diversity as a compelli...
On March 8, 2004, the University at Buffalo Law School hosted its annual Mitchell Lecture,1 a panel ...
On November 4, 2019, Catholic Law’s American Constitution Society (ACS) hosted an evening lecture en...
This article addresses the compelling interest states have in the educational benefit of diversity i...
This article evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appe...
Monday, March 4, 2013 Georgia Law was featured in the Daily Report regarding a panel discussion held...
The lack of racial diversity on our nation’s courts threatens both the quality and legitimacy of jud...
This Article concludes that political dialogue engendered by controversial minority judicial nominat...
Prof. Robert Butkin introduces the first panel of the day, Judicial Activism v. Judicial Restraint
According to the most recent report of The New York Judicial Committee on Women in the Courts, publi...
Part I of this Article considers the different voices and perspectives added to the judiciary by the...
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether diversity is...
For five minority judges who hold leadership positions in the judiciary, one of the great benefits ...
Assistant Professor Anne Mullins recently attended a judicial panel hosted by the University of Chic...
As is evident from these articles, the question of judicial diversity is far more complex and nuance...
Twice in the past two years, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved educational diversity as a compelli...
On March 8, 2004, the University at Buffalo Law School hosted its annual Mitchell Lecture,1 a panel ...
On November 4, 2019, Catholic Law’s American Constitution Society (ACS) hosted an evening lecture en...
This article addresses the compelling interest states have in the educational benefit of diversity i...
This article evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appe...