The computer bulletin board presents a difficult legal problem when defamation is at issue. Because defamation standards vary with the role of the publisher in the distribution process, the legal responsibility of the bulletin board\u27s sponsor is uncertain. This Article criticizes the current analogical approach used by the courts. It also rejects the negligence and strict liability rules. Instead, the Article proposes a reason to know and reasonable time to remove standard, which comports with constitutional requirements, practical limits to preventing defamation, and the countervailing need to prevent injury
Defamation, or defamation of character, is heard often in the media when one person has supposedly m...
Today I want to discuss the ongoing issue of how the internet is affecting areas of media law – in t...
A Standing Committee is currently considering reform to Australia's uniform defamation laws. This a...
Courts must determine the standard of liability for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that proactive...
According to the Communications Decency Act of 1996, a provider of an interactive computer service c...
This article will explore several mechanisms for the resolution of defamation cases. It will first r...
Given the broad meaning of publication in defamation law, internet intermediaries such as internet s...
This vast use of the Internet changes the scope of harm associated with defamation. Communications o...
Fear of liability has caused many employers to refrain from giving references or reasons for termina...
Should courts find that a defamatory communication made between employees of the same corporation do...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
There is a literal prohibition in the media bar that media lawyers cannot represent plaintiffs in su...
The law of defamation is not new to the world, nor limited to certain nations: Moses commanded: Nei...
This Note highlights the growing concern of Internet defamation and the lack of viable legal remedie...
This article discusses mandatory retraction, which court rulings and legal literature rarely have ad...
Defamation, or defamation of character, is heard often in the media when one person has supposedly m...
Today I want to discuss the ongoing issue of how the internet is affecting areas of media law – in t...
A Standing Committee is currently considering reform to Australia's uniform defamation laws. This a...
Courts must determine the standard of liability for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that proactive...
According to the Communications Decency Act of 1996, a provider of an interactive computer service c...
This article will explore several mechanisms for the resolution of defamation cases. It will first r...
Given the broad meaning of publication in defamation law, internet intermediaries such as internet s...
This vast use of the Internet changes the scope of harm associated with defamation. Communications o...
Fear of liability has caused many employers to refrain from giving references or reasons for termina...
Should courts find that a defamatory communication made between employees of the same corporation do...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
There is a literal prohibition in the media bar that media lawyers cannot represent plaintiffs in su...
The law of defamation is not new to the world, nor limited to certain nations: Moses commanded: Nei...
This Note highlights the growing concern of Internet defamation and the lack of viable legal remedie...
This article discusses mandatory retraction, which court rulings and legal literature rarely have ad...
Defamation, or defamation of character, is heard often in the media when one person has supposedly m...
Today I want to discuss the ongoing issue of how the internet is affecting areas of media law – in t...
A Standing Committee is currently considering reform to Australia's uniform defamation laws. This a...