The advent of computerized ticketing has made the purchase of entertainment tickets more convenient for consumers-but often at a steep cost. Are ever-increasing ticketing service charges the result of antitrust violations or other unlawful business practices as consumers have charged? This Note examines recent class action antitrust lawsuits against the dominant California computerized ticket agencies, entertainment venues and promoters. It summarizes and analyzes the relevant California statutes and case law at issue and concludes there is merit to some, but not all, of the plaintiffs\u27 claims
In class action antitrust litigation, the standards for acceptable economic analysis at class certif...
In 2012 the Department of Justice brought suit against Apple and five major US publishing houses for...
In May 2003, without admitting wrongdoing, music distributors and retailers settled with private pla...
This Note aims to explore the legal underpinnings of consumer frustration with Ticketmaster and the ...
When firms collude and charge supra-competitive prices, consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits again...
California Antitrust laws, in contrast to the federal antitrust laws, permit recovery by a broad ran...
California statutes provide elaborate protections for consumers from abuse by deceptive, unlawful, a...
Computer industry marketing practices have been subject to frequent challenge under U.S. antitrust l...
Since the 1970s, at any given movie theater, one price has been charged for all movies, seven days a...
This Essay considers antitrust and consumer protection liability for coercive practices vis-à-vis dr...
In U.S. antitrust, pricing below some level of cost has become almost necessary to a finding of pred...
The California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law derives from statutes, policies, concerns, and h...
in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, claiming a fraud (not a violation against antitrust ...
In Apple v. Pepper the Supreme Court held that consumers who allegedly paid too much for apps sold o...
What is the current vitality of antitrust enforcement? Antitrust class actions—the primary mode of c...
In class action antitrust litigation, the standards for acceptable economic analysis at class certif...
In 2012 the Department of Justice brought suit against Apple and five major US publishing houses for...
In May 2003, without admitting wrongdoing, music distributors and retailers settled with private pla...
This Note aims to explore the legal underpinnings of consumer frustration with Ticketmaster and the ...
When firms collude and charge supra-competitive prices, consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits again...
California Antitrust laws, in contrast to the federal antitrust laws, permit recovery by a broad ran...
California statutes provide elaborate protections for consumers from abuse by deceptive, unlawful, a...
Computer industry marketing practices have been subject to frequent challenge under U.S. antitrust l...
Since the 1970s, at any given movie theater, one price has been charged for all movies, seven days a...
This Essay considers antitrust and consumer protection liability for coercive practices vis-à-vis dr...
In U.S. antitrust, pricing below some level of cost has become almost necessary to a finding of pred...
The California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law derives from statutes, policies, concerns, and h...
in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, claiming a fraud (not a violation against antitrust ...
In Apple v. Pepper the Supreme Court held that consumers who allegedly paid too much for apps sold o...
What is the current vitality of antitrust enforcement? Antitrust class actions—the primary mode of c...
In class action antitrust litigation, the standards for acceptable economic analysis at class certif...
In 2012 the Department of Justice brought suit against Apple and five major US publishing houses for...
In May 2003, without admitting wrongdoing, music distributors and retailers settled with private pla...