The Eighth Circuit recently held that Mead Data Central infringed West Publishing\u27s copyright by using page numbers from West\u27s case reporters in its computer-assisted legal research system, LEXIS. Mead Data Central intended to insert West\u27s page numbers in its case database so that LEXIS users could have pinpoint citations to pages in West\u27s case reporters. The author examines the opinion in detail, concluding that the court\u27s decision stretched copyright protection too far. The author maintains that the unfortunate result of West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data Central should be changed through judicial action or legislative amendment to the Copyright Act. In addition, the author suggests other remedies, such as inventing an al...
On New Year’s Eve, the long-running copyright dispute between the Authors Guild and Google turned an...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided two separate cases which will change how copyright infri...
The Eighth Circuit recently held that Mead Data Central infringed West Publishing\u27s copyright by ...
Legal publishers have attempted to get around the public domain status by claiming that unique page ...
Raw data is not open to copyright, but databases, as compilations of data, have been treated differe...
In American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, the Second Circuit held that a corporate employee\u27s unau...
This article is about the importance of the copyright law jurisprudence from the U.S. Court of Appea...
The issue dealt with in this amici curiae brief is the judicial ability (or inability) to take away ...
Starting in late 2012, and continuing into late 2013, the United States District Court for the South...
In the recent British Horseracing Board case, the English High Court signaled a return to the sweat...
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued three landmark decisions in 2007 that addressed how copyri...
The Federal District Court in the Georgia State University copyright case (Cambridge University Pres...
In MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Peak commit...
The Supreme Court\u27s landmark ruling Lotus Development Corp vs Paperback Software International ...
On New Year’s Eve, the long-running copyright dispute between the Authors Guild and Google turned an...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided two separate cases which will change how copyright infri...
The Eighth Circuit recently held that Mead Data Central infringed West Publishing\u27s copyright by ...
Legal publishers have attempted to get around the public domain status by claiming that unique page ...
Raw data is not open to copyright, but databases, as compilations of data, have been treated differe...
In American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, the Second Circuit held that a corporate employee\u27s unau...
This article is about the importance of the copyright law jurisprudence from the U.S. Court of Appea...
The issue dealt with in this amici curiae brief is the judicial ability (or inability) to take away ...
Starting in late 2012, and continuing into late 2013, the United States District Court for the South...
In the recent British Horseracing Board case, the English High Court signaled a return to the sweat...
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued three landmark decisions in 2007 that addressed how copyri...
The Federal District Court in the Georgia State University copyright case (Cambridge University Pres...
In MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Peak commit...
The Supreme Court\u27s landmark ruling Lotus Development Corp vs Paperback Software International ...
On New Year’s Eve, the long-running copyright dispute between the Authors Guild and Google turned an...
In the wake of Feist, copyright practitioners are scrambling to determine what it all means, and how...
On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided two separate cases which will change how copyright infri...