Add to ORKGA peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and broadcast the videotapes entered into evidence. This issue requires balancing of the defendant\u27s fair trial rights against interests closely analogous to those protected by the First Amendment. This note suggests the lines upon which analysis of the conflicting interests should run, and argues for a strong presumption in favor of access
In the continuing effort to convict only the guilty and free only the innocent increasing attention ...
This paper assesses the ramifications of the Cabinet Social Policy Committees proposals contained in...
This Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish acc...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
Videotape presentations in courtroom proceedings are admissible upon the proper foundation of accura...
This study investigated the tension between the right to freedom of expression and the right to a fa...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
The rights of an accused to a fair trial, and freedom of the press, both are fundamental rights guar...
In accordance with the principle of public trial, trial broadcasting is required. There were various...
The allowance of cameras in the courtroom and televised trials have seemed to cause a debate within ...
The right to an open or public trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to a fair trial are...
This paper explores the effects of pre-trial publicity on criminal case proceedings, and how publici...
The public\u27s interest in high-profile crimes and the media\u27s coverage of high-profile trials h...
In the continuing effort to convict only the guilty and free only the innocent increasing attention ...
This paper assesses the ramifications of the Cabinet Social Policy Committees proposals contained in...
This Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish acc...
A peripheral but hotly contested issue in the Abscam trials was whether the media could copy and bro...
This Note advocates recognition of a constitutional right of press access to evidentiary recordings ...
Videotape presentations in courtroom proceedings are admissible upon the proper foundation of accura...
This study investigated the tension between the right to freedom of expression and the right to a fa...
This Note analyzes the conflicting interests involved in televising state criminal trials and propos...
Over the past twenty years, most American courthouses have been wired with audio and video recording...
The rights of an accused to a fair trial, and freedom of the press, both are fundamental rights guar...
In accordance with the principle of public trial, trial broadcasting is required. There were various...
The allowance of cameras in the courtroom and televised trials have seemed to cause a debate within ...
The right to an open or public trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to a fair trial are...
This paper explores the effects of pre-trial publicity on criminal case proceedings, and how publici...
The public\u27s interest in high-profile crimes and the media\u27s coverage of high-profile trials h...
In the continuing effort to convict only the guilty and free only the innocent increasing attention ...
This paper assesses the ramifications of the Cabinet Social Policy Committees proposals contained in...
This Note examines the ongoing electronic media access dispute and suggests methods to establish acc...