The Federal Communications Commission\u27s enabling statute, the Communications Act of 1934, provides no statutory authority for the regulation of the television networks. Nonetheless, with judicial approval, the FCC indirectly regulates the networks via its licensing authority over broadcast stations affiliated with the networks and has even promulgated rules by which it directly regulates the networks. This article reviews the case law focusing on the FCC\u27s extension of its jurisdiction to the television networks and to cable television, which is similarly unreferenced in the Act. The article argues that the FCC should have consistent jurisdiction to regulate the cable and broadcast network industries under the reasonably ancillary s...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
This Article challenges the various jurisdictional theories that underpin the FCC’s net neutrality r...
This note first argues that the court correctly applied the least scrutinizing first amendment test ...
The Federal Communications Commission\u27s enabling statute, the Communications Act of 1934, provide...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
From the moment it emerged as an independently viable communications medium, the cable television in...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stunned the cable television industry with its decis...
After having recently adopted a variety of complex decisions concerning the digital television trans...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
This Article challenges the various jurisdictional theories that underpin the FCC’s net neutrality r...
This note first argues that the court correctly applied the least scrutinizing first amendment test ...
The Federal Communications Commission\u27s enabling statute, the Communications Act of 1934, provide...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
As cable television develops into a communications medium capable of providing a vast array of voice...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
From the moment it emerged as an independently viable communications medium, the cable television in...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
On October 29, 1984, a new era began in the relationship between law and cable television. On that d...
The Supreme Court of the United States recently stunned the cable television industry with its decis...
After having recently adopted a variety of complex decisions concerning the digital television trans...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
This Article challenges the various jurisdictional theories that underpin the FCC’s net neutrality r...
This note first argues that the court correctly applied the least scrutinizing first amendment test ...