The Supreme Court unanimously agrees that excessive partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional. A plurality of the Court, however, would hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be nonjusticiable due to the lack of a judicially manageable standard. This Note synthesizes the opinions of a majority of the Court in Vieth v. Jubelirer on the precise harms of partisan gerrymandering and argues that excessive partisan gerrymandering unconstitutionally burdens the representational rights of individual voters. This Note proposes a judicially manageable standard to address that representational harm based on the Court\u27s standard in Shaw v. Reno
It has been notoriously difficult for the United States Supreme Court to develop a judicially manage...
When the Supreme Court last seriously grappled with partisan gerrymandering, all nine Justices concl...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. Common Cause was the latest in a line of opinions re...
The Supreme Court unanimously agrees that excessive partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional. A p...
In Vieth v. Jubelirer, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court determined that, at least for the mome...
Twice in the last two decades, the Supreme Court has come within two votes of declaring partisan ger...
In November 2016, a federal court struck as unconstitutional Wisconsin’s redistricting map under bot...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
Political gerrymandering involves the intentional manipulation of legislative boundaries by one poli...
In recent years, the judiciary’s inability to hold state legislatures accountable for partisan gerry...
The Supreme Court recognizes that [p]artisangerrymanders... [are incompatible] with democraticprinc...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
This Article challenges the basic premise in the law of gerrymandering that partisanship is a consti...
InVieth v. Jubilirer(2004) the Supreme Court found that claims of political gerrymandering could not...
Judges and scholars are convinced that the Constitution forbids gerrymandering that goes too far --...
It has been notoriously difficult for the United States Supreme Court to develop a judicially manage...
When the Supreme Court last seriously grappled with partisan gerrymandering, all nine Justices concl...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. Common Cause was the latest in a line of opinions re...
The Supreme Court unanimously agrees that excessive partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional. A p...
In Vieth v. Jubelirer, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court determined that, at least for the mome...
Twice in the last two decades, the Supreme Court has come within two votes of declaring partisan ger...
In November 2016, a federal court struck as unconstitutional Wisconsin’s redistricting map under bot...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
Political gerrymandering involves the intentional manipulation of legislative boundaries by one poli...
In recent years, the judiciary’s inability to hold state legislatures accountable for partisan gerry...
The Supreme Court recognizes that [p]artisangerrymanders... [are incompatible] with democraticprinc...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
This Article challenges the basic premise in the law of gerrymandering that partisanship is a consti...
InVieth v. Jubilirer(2004) the Supreme Court found that claims of political gerrymandering could not...
Judges and scholars are convinced that the Constitution forbids gerrymandering that goes too far --...
It has been notoriously difficult for the United States Supreme Court to develop a judicially manage...
When the Supreme Court last seriously grappled with partisan gerrymandering, all nine Justices concl...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. Common Cause was the latest in a line of opinions re...