This Article asserts a new theory about why and how the Supreme Court accepts and decides its Indian law docket: the Court identifies an important constitutional concern embedded in a petition for certiorari, grants certiorari, and then applies its decision- making discretion to decide the important constitutional concern. Once that portion of the Indian law case is decided, the Court decides any remaining federal Indian law questions in order to reach a result consistent with its decision on the important constitutional concern. Indian law disputes are often mere vessels for the Court to tackle larger questions; often these questions have little to do with federal Indian law. And, since Indian law is not as grounded in the Constitution a...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
The Supreme Court\u27s decisions have been characterized by an absence of general principles, which ...
Part I of this article examines three older Supreme Court decisions, the cases that form the backdro...
This Article asserts a new theory about why and how the Supreme Court accepts and decides its Indian...
In this article, I identify a disconnect between the national policy relating to Indian affairs as e...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
In a symposium on the future of Indian law, this article suggests that the future would be brighter ...
This past August, while accepting the Rule of Law award from the American Bar Association, Justice...
In very few countries worldwide, is constitutionalism confined to the apex court’s courtrooms, the w...
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction ...
Is federal Indian law dead? Despite a declining docket during the Rehnquist Court, the Supreme Court...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
As a nation of over one billion people and the world’s largest democracy, India is sometimes confron...
The first section discusses sovereignty and the sources for foundational principles that pertain to ...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the Supreme Court’s discretionary appellate jurisdict...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
The Supreme Court\u27s decisions have been characterized by an absence of general principles, which ...
Part I of this article examines three older Supreme Court decisions, the cases that form the backdro...
This Article asserts a new theory about why and how the Supreme Court accepts and decides its Indian...
In this article, I identify a disconnect between the national policy relating to Indian affairs as e...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
In a symposium on the future of Indian law, this article suggests that the future would be brighter ...
This past August, while accepting the Rule of Law award from the American Bar Association, Justice...
In very few countries worldwide, is constitutionalism confined to the apex court’s courtrooms, the w...
Examining the ongoing debate concerning congressional power to eliminate federal court jurisdiction ...
Is federal Indian law dead? Despite a declining docket during the Rehnquist Court, the Supreme Court...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
As a nation of over one billion people and the world’s largest democracy, India is sometimes confron...
The first section discusses sovereignty and the sources for foundational principles that pertain to ...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the Supreme Court’s discretionary appellate jurisdict...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
The Supreme Court\u27s decisions have been characterized by an absence of general principles, which ...
Part I of this article examines three older Supreme Court decisions, the cases that form the backdro...