Add to ORKGThe brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited Law Schools in Grutter v. Bollinger was written so as to intervene and to assist in the refraining of the public debate surrounding minority admissions programs in institutions of higher education
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan Law Sc...
Amici are law professors with expertise in the requirements for class certification under Rule 23 of...
The editors of Minnesota Law Review greatly value the opportunity to make this significant brief rea...
The brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited La...
The Sixth Circuit below correctly ruled that the applicable precedent in this case is Regents of the...
Brief of the University of Michigan Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, the University ...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of C...
The district court below correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Lynn School Committee’s Volun...
The District Court correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Jefferson County Board of Education...
In this brief, the CRP does not address how social science research relates to the constitutionality...
It is both an honor and a pleasure to write the Foreword for this issue of the National Black Law Jo...
Consistent with Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. B...
This article summarizes a recent amicus brief written by the Korematsu Center. It describes a Spokan...
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan Law Sc...
Amici are law professors with expertise in the requirements for class certification under Rule 23 of...
The editors of Minnesota Law Review greatly value the opportunity to make this significant brief rea...
The brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited La...
The Sixth Circuit below correctly ruled that the applicable precedent in this case is Regents of the...
Brief of the University of Michigan Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, the University ...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should reaffirm its decision in Regents of University of C...
The district court below correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Lynn School Committee’s Volun...
The District Court correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Jefferson County Board of Education...
In this brief, the CRP does not address how social science research relates to the constitutionality...
It is both an honor and a pleasure to write the Foreword for this issue of the National Black Law Jo...
Consistent with Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. B...
This article summarizes a recent amicus brief written by the Korematsu Center. It describes a Spokan...
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the United States Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan Law Sc...
Amici are law professors with expertise in the requirements for class certification under Rule 23 of...
The editors of Minnesota Law Review greatly value the opportunity to make this significant brief rea...