New Legal Realist methodologies afford comparative advantages in showing how law impacts people in their everyday lives and these methodologies sometimes can be especially helpful in increasing knowledge with respect to certain poorly understood and under-theorized legal issues implicating inequalities of one type or another. Further, scholars who use New Legal Realist methodologies can help build a bridge between scholarly understanding and policy change by revealing problems with the law that had not been previously recognized to any significant degree. At the same time, scholarship in and of itself rarely catalyzes legal reform but instead needs to be linked to a broader reform effort if a scholar would like to contribute to actual refor...