Add to ORKGThe Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) was the product of an extended and well-organized political campaign. In Congress, its passage required a grinding eight-year effort, several modifications to the original proposal, numerous committee hearings, multiple reports by both Houses, political compromises that drew some Democratic support, two unsuccessful attempts to terminate debate in the Senate by imposing cloture, and strenuous efforts to amend in both the House and Senate when the bill came to the floor for a final vote. Passage also required Republican control of both Houses of Congress and the presidency as well
This report discusses the Class Action Fairness Act of 2002. The bill reflects a preference for clas...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
The year 2005 witnessed two watershed developments in federal jurisdiction: the U.S. Supreme Court\u...
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) was the product of an extended and well-organized polit...
Procedural reforms alter litigation options directly, but they alter the litigation landscape in mor...
The Class Action Fairness Act has taken on its real form through construction by the federal judges....
The Class Action Fairness Act has taken on its real form through construction by the federal judges....
In enacting the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Congress intended to expand access to the ...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
More than a decade after Congress passed the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), courts contin...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
This Article discusses the significance of the Consumer Class Action Bill of Rights, found in sectio...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
This report discusses the Class Action Fairness Act of 2002. The bill reflects a preference for clas...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
The year 2005 witnessed two watershed developments in federal jurisdiction: the U.S. Supreme Court\u...
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) was the product of an extended and well-organized polit...
Procedural reforms alter litigation options directly, but they alter the litigation landscape in mor...
The Class Action Fairness Act has taken on its real form through construction by the federal judges....
The Class Action Fairness Act has taken on its real form through construction by the federal judges....
In enacting the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Congress intended to expand access to the ...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
As courts confront, and commentators begin to write about, the many jurisdictional questions that em...
More than a decade after Congress passed the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), courts contin...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
This Article discusses the significance of the Consumer Class Action Bill of Rights, found in sectio...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
This report discusses the Class Action Fairness Act of 2002. The bill reflects a preference for clas...
This Article, prepared for a conference on the Class Action Fairness Act, examines the effect of CAF...
The year 2005 witnessed two watershed developments in federal jurisdiction: the U.S. Supreme Court\u...