Courts and commentators routinely assume that “bias” on the jury encompasses any source of influence upon jurors that does not come directly from the evidence presented at trial. This sweeping conception of juror bias is flawed because it fails to distinguish the prejudices and affinities that infect jury decisionmaking from the experiences and perspectives that enrich it. This Article uses a thought experiment informed by the neuroscience of bias to illuminate the complexity of juror influences that go by the name of bias. I distinguish four distinct categories of juror influence: personal interests, community interests, case-specific beliefs, and case-general beliefs. I apply this spectrum of juror bias to provide a sounder way to think a...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
In recent years, social injustice and racial bias in the United States has become a main focus withi...
Whilst jury trials are widely considered to be a fairer way of deciding whether an accused person is...
Courts and commentators routinely assume that “bias” on the jury encompasses any source of influence...
Encounters with the legal system are unevenly distributed throughout the American population, with B...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
Prior research by Kaplan and Miller (1978) suggested that juries are generally influenced less by ex...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Juries are often thought of as being fair and crucial to producing fair trials. Things such as scien...
Before the 1990s controlled research using mock jurors consistently found black defendants guilty mo...
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution grants the accused individual the right to a f...
This Article investigates whether one of the most intractable problems in trial procedure can be ame...
This Article investigates whether one of the most intractable problems in trial procedure can be ame...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
Purpose. The objective of this review was to give a broad overview of various biases associated with...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
In recent years, social injustice and racial bias in the United States has become a main focus withi...
Whilst jury trials are widely considered to be a fairer way of deciding whether an accused person is...
Courts and commentators routinely assume that “bias” on the jury encompasses any source of influence...
Encounters with the legal system are unevenly distributed throughout the American population, with B...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
Prior research by Kaplan and Miller (1978) suggested that juries are generally influenced less by ex...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Juries are often thought of as being fair and crucial to producing fair trials. Things such as scien...
Before the 1990s controlled research using mock jurors consistently found black defendants guilty mo...
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution grants the accused individual the right to a f...
This Article investigates whether one of the most intractable problems in trial procedure can be ame...
This Article investigates whether one of the most intractable problems in trial procedure can be ame...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
Purpose. The objective of this review was to give a broad overview of various biases associated with...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
In recent years, social injustice and racial bias in the United States has become a main focus withi...
Whilst jury trials are widely considered to be a fairer way of deciding whether an accused person is...