Topics
footballActivity
Division I football players exemplify the greatest range in body mass of any modern team sport. Body mass may differ by over 80 kg between the various positions. Absolute muscular strength is typically greater in larger individuals, but such data does not allow for accurate comparisons. Therefore, in order to compare the performance indices of individual groups allometric rather than ratio scaling has been suggested. The purpose of this study was to compare absolute strength, normalized ratio and allometrically scaled data among players of different size
For comparative purposes, normalisation of strength measures to body size using allometric scaling i...
The aim of the study was to compare allometrically scaled peak force and the force at 250 ms between...
Previous research has demonstrated the importance of both dynamic and isometric maximal strength and...
Division I football players exemplify the greatest range in body mass of any modern team sport. Body...
The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lin...
The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lin...
Bert H. Jacobson (FACSM). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma; e-mail: bert.jacobson@oks...
Spencer Newell1, Brenden Kelly1, Monica L. Hunter1, Allison Oligschlaeger1, Jana L. Arabas1, Jerry L...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of predicting actual one repetition maxi...
Athletes with a higher body mass (BM) tend to be stronger, with ratio scaling possibly eliminating t...
Bilsborough, JC, Greenway, KG, Opar, DA, Livingstone, SG, Cordy, JT, Bird, SR, and Coutts, AJ. Compa...
The aim of this study was to compare the anthropometry, upper-body strength, and lower-body power ch...
Reactive strength (RS) represents function of a muscle’s stretch shortening cycle, or the ability to...
This study examined the validity of various scaling methods, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak fo...
The estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) bench press and NFL-225 (225-lb or 102-kg) repetition tes...
For comparative purposes, normalisation of strength measures to body size using allometric scaling i...
The aim of the study was to compare allometrically scaled peak force and the force at 250 ms between...
Previous research has demonstrated the importance of both dynamic and isometric maximal strength and...
Division I football players exemplify the greatest range in body mass of any modern team sport. Body...
The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lin...
The purpose of the present study was to examine the differences in upper body power output among lin...
Bert H. Jacobson (FACSM). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma; e-mail: bert.jacobson@oks...
Spencer Newell1, Brenden Kelly1, Monica L. Hunter1, Allison Oligschlaeger1, Jana L. Arabas1, Jerry L...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of predicting actual one repetition maxi...
Athletes with a higher body mass (BM) tend to be stronger, with ratio scaling possibly eliminating t...
Bilsborough, JC, Greenway, KG, Opar, DA, Livingstone, SG, Cordy, JT, Bird, SR, and Coutts, AJ. Compa...
The aim of this study was to compare the anthropometry, upper-body strength, and lower-body power ch...
Reactive strength (RS) represents function of a muscle’s stretch shortening cycle, or the ability to...
This study examined the validity of various scaling methods, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak fo...
The estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) bench press and NFL-225 (225-lb or 102-kg) repetition tes...
For comparative purposes, normalisation of strength measures to body size using allometric scaling i...
The aim of the study was to compare allometrically scaled peak force and the force at 250 ms between...
Previous research has demonstrated the importance of both dynamic and isometric maximal strength and...
Add to ORKG