What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial divers...
Feminist Judgments’s focus on jurists alone is not unusual. My own discipline has devoted a great de...
Judicial decision-making is not a neutral and logical enterprise that involves applying clear rules ...
Professor Linda Berger rejoins her Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supre...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
Book Chapter United States v. Virginia, 518 US 515 (1996), in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
In 1995, the authors of a law review article examining “feminist judging” focused on the existing so...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project turns attention to the U.S. Supreme Court. Contributors to this ...
The word “feminism” means different things to its many supporters (and undoubtedly, to its detractor...
While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors of legal practi...
This chapter, part of Integrating Doctrine and Diversity: Inclusion and Equity in the Law School Cla...
Feminist Judgments’s focus on jurists alone is not unusual. My own discipline has devoted a great de...
Judicial decision-making is not a neutral and logical enterprise that involves applying clear rules ...
Professor Linda Berger rejoins her Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supre...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
Book Chapter United States v. Virginia, 518 US 515 (1996), in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
In 1995, the authors of a law review article examining “feminist judging” focused on the existing so...
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were wri...
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project turns attention to the U.S. Supreme Court. Contributors to this ...
The word “feminism” means different things to its many supporters (and undoubtedly, to its detractor...
While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors of legal practi...
This chapter, part of Integrating Doctrine and Diversity: Inclusion and Equity in the Law School Cla...
Feminist Judgments’s focus on jurists alone is not unusual. My own discipline has devoted a great de...
Judicial decision-making is not a neutral and logical enterprise that involves applying clear rules ...
Professor Linda Berger rejoins her Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supre...