Add to ORKGThe Court held that a statement by an attorney on her firm’s website summarizing a jury’s verdict is not a statement in direct connection with an issue under consideration by a judicial body. The Court explained that because the statement is not a “good faith communication in furtherance of the right . . . to free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern,” it would not receive anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) protection under NRS § 41.660(1)
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The Court held that evidentiary hearings are appropriate on fair-cross-section challenges when the d...
The Court clarified that the appropriate standard of review for a district court’s denial or grant o...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
The Court held that Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statutes do not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial ...
The Court determined that statements sent to an email listserv criticizing an attorney’s courtroom c...
This issue was whether several of Jacky Rosen’s statements about Danny Tarkanian made during her pol...
The Nevada Supreme Court reversed a district court order dismissing former casino mogul Steve Wynn’s...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
The Court determined that Nevada caselaw and NRCP 4(c) give conflicting opinions on whether an attor...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether public-comment ...
The Court expressly repudiated the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of Nevada law in Riley v. McDaniel...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered a case in which several...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The Court held that evidentiary hearings are appropriate on fair-cross-section challenges when the d...
The Court clarified that the appropriate standard of review for a district court’s denial or grant o...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
The Court held that Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statutes do not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial ...
The Court determined that statements sent to an email listserv criticizing an attorney’s courtroom c...
This issue was whether several of Jacky Rosen’s statements about Danny Tarkanian made during her pol...
The Nevada Supreme Court reversed a district court order dismissing former casino mogul Steve Wynn’s...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
In an en banc decision, the Nevada Supreme Court considered an issue of first impression regarding N...
The Court determined that Nevada caselaw and NRCP 4(c) give conflicting opinions on whether an attor...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether public-comment ...
The Court expressly repudiated the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of Nevada law in Riley v. McDaniel...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Nevada Supreme Court considered a case in which several...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The Court held that evidentiary hearings are appropriate on fair-cross-section challenges when the d...
The Court clarified that the appropriate standard of review for a district court’s denial or grant o...