ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW AS THE BASIS FOR ACQUIRING RIGHTS FROM PUBLIC FUNDS IN THE CASE OF CASE-LAW OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

V magistrskem delu je raziskana tematika socialne zakonodaje Republike Slovenije s poudarkom na denarnih socialnih prejemkih. V začetnem delu naloge je predstavljen teoretičen del socialne zakonodaje, pri katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da nova socialna zakonodaja ni v popolnosti odpravila administrativnih ovir in da imajo prosilci še vedno težave pri uveljavljanju posameznih pravic. V nalogi sta bila postavljena dva glavna namena: prvi je bil preveritev stanja socialne zakonodaje v Grčiji in Malti (državi sta bili izbrani po ključu največje in najmanjše brezposelnosti prebivalstva v državi), drugi pa se je nanašal na analizo sodne prakse Upravnega in Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije na temelju pridobivanja pravic do denarnega prejemka. Sama predstavitev socialnih zakonodaj obeh držav je pokazala, da se socialna zakonodaja preiskovanih držav od slovenske ne razlikuje v preveliki meri. Kljub temu pa so se ob predstavitvi socialne zakonodaje obeh držav pojavili predlogi dopolnitev slovenske socialne zakonodaje, ki so predstavljeni v zaključnem delu naloge. Skozi analizo sodnih praks je bilo ugotovljeno, da bo baza sodb, če se oprem le na denarne prejemke, absolutno premajhna. Tako se je analiza razširila na vse sodbe Upravnega in Vrhovnega sodišča RS, kjer je med izvajanjem vseh zakonov, ki urejajo pridobivanje pravic iz javnih sredstev, prišlo do bistvenih kršitev določil Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku. Na podlagi te analize je bilo ugotovljeno, da je sodna praksa obeh omenjenih sodišč usklajena in enotna, vendar je v veliki večini sodb izpostavljena procesna napaka, kjer organ stranki ni dal možnosti izjaviti se o zadevi, kar pomeni kršitev 9. člena ZUP.The master\u27s thesis deals with the topic of social legislation of the Republic of Slovenia with an emphasis on monetary social benefits. In the initial part of the task, the theoretical part of social legislation is presented, in which it was found that the new social legislation did not completely eliminate administrative barriers and that applicants still have difficulties in exercising individual rights. Two main purposes were set out in the task: the first was to review the position of social legislation in Greece and Malta (the countries were chosen as the countries of the largest and the lowest unemployment of the population in the country in EU), and the second purpose was related to the analysis of the case law of the Administrative and Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia based on the acquisition of rights to monetary receipts. The presentation of the social legislation of both countries showed that the social legislation of the countries examined does not differ significantly from Slovenian. Nevertheless, when presenting the social legislation of both countries, proposals for supplementing the Slovenian social legislation appeared, which are presented in the final part of the task. Through the analysis of the case-law, it was found that the judgment base, if only for cash benefits considered, is absolutely insufficient. Thus, the analysis extended to all judgments of the Administrative and Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, where, during the implementation of all the laws governing the acquisition of rights from public funds, there were material violations of the provisions of the General Administrative Procedure Act. On the basis of this analysis, it was found that the case-law of both courts mentioned above was harmonized, but in the vast majority of judgments the procedural error was exposed, whereby the authority did not give the party the opportunity to state the case, which is a violation of Article 9 of the ZUP