The body of evidence indicating that the poor reporting of outcomes in research hinders progress in medicine is growing. For example, a systematic review of 79 randomised trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre‐eclampsia has identified 72 different maternal and 47 offspring outcomes.1 In addition to the lack of consensus regarding which outcomes to measure, there is also disagreement on which definitions or instruments to use for measurements.2 The authors of another study identified a lack of uniformity in the definition of maternal morbidities,3 that hinder comparisons of those conditions across countries
Trials evaluating the same interventions rarely measure or report identical outcomes. This limits th...
Background Selective reporting of outcomes within a published study based on their nature or directi...
International audienceBackground: Inadequate planning, selective reporting, and incomplete reporting...
Clinical research should ultimately improve patient care. To enable this, randomized controlled tria...
Background Standardising outcome collection and reporting in pre-eclampsia trials requires an apprai...
Outcomes in gestational diabetes Cochrane protocols and reviews before and after development of 'sta...
BACKGROUND: Standardising outcome collection and reporting in pre-eclampsia trials requires an appra...
Background: An outcome is a measured effect a treatment has on an individual, but in other fields ...
ObjectiveInconsistent outcome selection and reporting in clinical trials are important sources of re...
Background: Complex issues, including a failure to consider the perspectives of people with fertilit...
Background: An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. Objectives...
Once awarded Archie Cochrane's infamous 'wooden spoon' for the limited application of randomised con...
It has been estimated that 85% of all clinical research is wasted. Suboptimal outcome selection is a...
Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes fo...
Background Variation in outcome collection and reporting is a serious hindrance to progress in our s...
Trials evaluating the same interventions rarely measure or report identical outcomes. This limits th...
Background Selective reporting of outcomes within a published study based on their nature or directi...
International audienceBackground: Inadequate planning, selective reporting, and incomplete reporting...
Clinical research should ultimately improve patient care. To enable this, randomized controlled tria...
Background Standardising outcome collection and reporting in pre-eclampsia trials requires an apprai...
Outcomes in gestational diabetes Cochrane protocols and reviews before and after development of 'sta...
BACKGROUND: Standardising outcome collection and reporting in pre-eclampsia trials requires an appra...
Background: An outcome is a measured effect a treatment has on an individual, but in other fields ...
ObjectiveInconsistent outcome selection and reporting in clinical trials are important sources of re...
Background: Complex issues, including a failure to consider the perspectives of people with fertilit...
Background: An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. Objectives...
Once awarded Archie Cochrane's infamous 'wooden spoon' for the limited application of randomised con...
It has been estimated that 85% of all clinical research is wasted. Suboptimal outcome selection is a...
Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes fo...
Background Variation in outcome collection and reporting is a serious hindrance to progress in our s...
Trials evaluating the same interventions rarely measure or report identical outcomes. This limits th...
Background Selective reporting of outcomes within a published study based on their nature or directi...
International audienceBackground: Inadequate planning, selective reporting, and incomplete reporting...