Add to ORKGIn the context of value-based argumentation frameworks, and collective decisions, we are interested in the behavior of agents who are willing to misrepresent their sincere beliefs about the ranking of values in order to ensure that their desired decision is agreed upon. We study the application of preference aggregation mechanisms towards reaching a compromise ranking of values for a group of agents. Further, we study under which conditions agents can manipulate the outcome of the discussion. We investigate the computational complexity of this problem
International audienceIn this work we address the issue of the uncertainty faced by a user participa...
International audienceCollective decision-making in multi-agents systems is classically performed by...
Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions ...
In the context of value-based argumentation frameworks, and collective decisions, we are interested ...
International audienceIn the context of value-based argumentation frameworks, and collective decisio...
Value-based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation graph - in which arguments are...
Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument ...
An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among t...
Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which argume...
Abstract Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plau-sible opinions about wh...
Value-based argumentation is concerned with recognising, accounting for, and reasoning with, the soc...
International audienceDifferent agents may have different points of view. Following a popular approa...
An abstract argumentation framework can be used to model the argumentative stance of an agent at a h...
International audienceOne of the most prominent ways to reach an acceptable collective decision in n...
International audienceDifferent agents may have different points of view. This can be modelled using...
International audienceIn this work we address the issue of the uncertainty faced by a user participa...
International audienceCollective decision-making in multi-agents systems is classically performed by...
Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions ...
In the context of value-based argumentation frameworks, and collective decisions, we are interested ...
International audienceIn the context of value-based argumentation frameworks, and collective decisio...
Value-based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation graph - in which arguments are...
Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument ...
An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among t...
Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which argume...
Abstract Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plau-sible opinions about wh...
Value-based argumentation is concerned with recognising, accounting for, and reasoning with, the soc...
International audienceDifferent agents may have different points of view. Following a popular approa...
An abstract argumentation framework can be used to model the argumentative stance of an agent at a h...
International audienceOne of the most prominent ways to reach an acceptable collective decision in n...
International audienceDifferent agents may have different points of view. This can be modelled using...
International audienceIn this work we address the issue of the uncertainty faced by a user participa...
International audienceCollective decision-making in multi-agents systems is classically performed by...
Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions ...