One hundred and eight patients with an endoscopically documented healed duodenal ulcer (DU) participated to a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, long-term study. The study was planned with the aim to compare the efficacy of nizatidine 150 mg with ranitidine 150 mg in preventing relapse during the 2 years following the DU healing. Fifty four patients were assigned to each treatment. Endoscopic examinations were scheduled at 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical evaluations were performed every two months. Routine laboratory tests were investigated at the beginning of the study and at each of the scheduled endoscopies
With the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment with ranitidine and nizatidine bot...
A 24-week, double-blind, randomized study at 13 centres compared the efficacy and safety of 20 mg fa...
This study was carried out in order to compare the antisecretory effect of a single bedtime dose of ...
An endoscopically controlled clinical trial on maintenance Ranitidine treatment of scarred duodenal ...
Nizatidine, 300 mg once nightly, was compared with cimetidine, 800 mg once nightly, for treatment of...
One hundred and one active gastric ulcer patients concluded an 8-week, randomized, double-blind mult...
Quality of life (QoL) is commonly assessed for evaluating the process and outcome of treatment but h...
One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with healed duodenal ulcer (DU) entered a single-blind, ...
Six hundred and five patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer were randomly allocated t...
In a double-blind controlled study eighty-two patients with duodenal or prepyloric ulcer were treate...
To investigate the efficacy of standard and low dosage of omeprazole in the healing of duodenal ulce...
Treatment of duodenal ulcer with the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine, was assessed in a...
PURPOSE: We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of seven forms of mainte...
An 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was performed with the aim of comparing nizat...
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of pantoprazole vers...
With the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment with ranitidine and nizatidine bot...
A 24-week, double-blind, randomized study at 13 centres compared the efficacy and safety of 20 mg fa...
This study was carried out in order to compare the antisecretory effect of a single bedtime dose of ...
An endoscopically controlled clinical trial on maintenance Ranitidine treatment of scarred duodenal ...
Nizatidine, 300 mg once nightly, was compared with cimetidine, 800 mg once nightly, for treatment of...
One hundred and one active gastric ulcer patients concluded an 8-week, randomized, double-blind mult...
Quality of life (QoL) is commonly assessed for evaluating the process and outcome of treatment but h...
One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with healed duodenal ulcer (DU) entered a single-blind, ...
Six hundred and five patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer were randomly allocated t...
In a double-blind controlled study eighty-two patients with duodenal or prepyloric ulcer were treate...
To investigate the efficacy of standard and low dosage of omeprazole in the healing of duodenal ulce...
Treatment of duodenal ulcer with the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine, was assessed in a...
PURPOSE: We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of seven forms of mainte...
An 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was performed with the aim of comparing nizat...
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of pantoprazole vers...
With the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment with ranitidine and nizatidine bot...
A 24-week, double-blind, randomized study at 13 centres compared the efficacy and safety of 20 mg fa...
This study was carried out in order to compare the antisecretory effect of a single bedtime dose of ...