Beware of the Diamond Dogs: Why a \u27Credentials Alone\u27 Conception of Probable Cause Violates the Compulsory Process Clause

In Florida v. Harris, the State has asked the Supreme Court to find that a positive alert by a certified narcotics-detection dog is per se sufficient, in and of itself, to establish probable cause for the search of a vehicle. This essay, to be published in conjunction with Leslie Shoebotham\u27s amici brief in Harris, argues that this credentials alone conception of probable cause violates the Compulsory Process Clause