In this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea of sequences of "alternative acceptable outcomes". We study the relationships between goals and concepts like agent's beliefs, norms, and desires, and we propose a formalisation using Defeasible Logic that will be able to provide a computationally feasible approach. The resulting system captures various nuances of the notion of goal against different normative domains, for which the right decision is not only context-dependent, but it must be chosen from a pool of alternatives as wide as possible
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
Traditional models of agents based on Beliefs, Desires and Intentions usually only include either d...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...
Abstract. In this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea o...
none5siIn this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea of s...
In this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea of sequence...
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like...
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like...
In this paper we consider the relation between beliefs and goals in agent theory. Beliefs play three...
In this paper we introduce a qualitative decision and game theory based on belief (B) and desire (D)...
In this paper we show how a deliberative agent can repre-sent beliefs and desires and perform defeas...
A rational agent adopts (or changes) its desires/goals when new information becomes available or its...
Goals, as typically conceived in AI planning, provide an insufficient basis for choice of action, an...
We explore the notions of permission and obli-gation and their role in knowledge representa-tion, es...
In this paper we study defeasible goals in Gabbay's labelled deductive systems. We prove the complet...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
Traditional models of agents based on Beliefs, Desires and Intentions usually only include either d...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...
Abstract. In this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea o...
none5siIn this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea of s...
In this paper we analyse different notions of the concept of goal starting from the idea of sequence...
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like...
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like...
In this paper we consider the relation between beliefs and goals in agent theory. Beliefs play three...
In this paper we introduce a qualitative decision and game theory based on belief (B) and desire (D)...
In this paper we show how a deliberative agent can repre-sent beliefs and desires and perform defeas...
A rational agent adopts (or changes) its desires/goals when new information becomes available or its...
Goals, as typically conceived in AI planning, provide an insufficient basis for choice of action, an...
We explore the notions of permission and obli-gation and their role in knowledge representa-tion, es...
In this paper we study defeasible goals in Gabbay's labelled deductive systems. We prove the complet...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
Traditional models of agents based on Beliefs, Desires and Intentions usually only include either d...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...