In previous work, we introduced a framework for the uniform formalization of families of non-classical logics with Kripke semantics, such as modal and relevance logics. Here we show how to use this framework to analyze the complexity of the decision problem for these logics, also in a uniform way. The result is a recipe: the user contributes bounds on structural reasoning and the accessibility relation associated with the Kripke semantics and the result is a decision procedure with bounded space requirements. As examples, we give PSPACE decision procedures for the modal logics K4 and S4, and for a positive fragment of the relevance logic B
Contents: List of Figures. List of Tables. Acknowledgments. 1. Introduction. Part I: Labelled deduct...
We study the complexity of model checking in propositional nonmonotonic logics. Specifically, we fir...
The subject of this work is the development and investigation of a \emph{framework} for the modular ...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pro...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pro...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pr...
In previous work we gave a new proof-theoretical method for establishing upper-bounds on the space c...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
Abstract. Proof complexity is an interdisciplinary area of research util-ising techniques from logic...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complex...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
Contents: List of Figures. List of Tables. Acknowledgments. 1. Introduction. Part I: Labelled deduct...
We study the complexity of model checking in propositional nonmonotonic logics. Specifically, we fir...
The subject of this work is the development and investigation of a \emph{framework} for the modular ...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pro...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pro...
We present a new proof-theoretic approach to bounding the complexity of the decision problem for pr...
In previous work we gave a new proof-theoretical method for establishing upper-bounds on the space c...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
Abstract. Proof complexity is an interdisciplinary area of research util-ising techniques from logic...
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-st...
For lack of general algorithmic methods that apply to wide classes of logics, establishing a complex...
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large fa...
Contents: List of Figures. List of Tables. Acknowledgments. 1. Introduction. Part I: Labelled deduct...
We study the complexity of model checking in propositional nonmonotonic logics. Specifically, we fir...
The subject of this work is the development and investigation of a \emph{framework} for the modular ...