During jury selection, many courts adopt a minimal approach to voir dire questioning, asking a small number of close-ended questions to groups of prospective jurors and requiring prospective jurors to volunteer their biases. The Article describes research evidence showing that limited voir dire questioning is often ineffective in detecting juror bias. To improve the effectiveness of voir dire, the authors make four recommendations: (1) increase the use of juror questionnaires; (2) incorporate some open-ended questions; (3) expand the types of questions that are asked; and (4) allow attorneys to participate in voir dire
As illustrated by the recent Los Angeles riots, communities perceive bias in the judicial system whe...
In the article, I discuss the potential use of public opinion polls to measure the discriminatory ef...
Over the last four decades, trial consultants have become integral members of the venire process. Be...
During jury selection, many courts adopt a minimal approach to voir dire questions, asking a small n...
In the United States, voir dire is viewed as essential to selecting an impartial jury. Judges, lawye...
This study of individualized jury selection for 792 potentialjurors across 12 North Carolina capital...
Jury selection is a cornerstone of the pre-trial preparations done before all cases. The voir dire p...
One question that attorneys in racially charged cases face is whether to attempt to conduct voir dir...
The voir dire process in jury selection, in which the prospective jurors are questioned about their ...
Giving attorneys more power in the voir dire (jury selection) process may allow them to 1) find grou...
Scholarship about racial disparities in jury selection is extensive, but the data about how parties ...
This Article examines the peremptory challenge as modified by Batson and its progeny. The discussion...
Whether judges and attorneys are able to detect bias among potential jurors (venirepersons) is a piv...
The present study asked two important questions: Does prejudicial pretrial publicity produce bias wh...
While the Supreme Court outlawed discrimination in jury selection over 40 years ago, both empirical ...
As illustrated by the recent Los Angeles riots, communities perceive bias in the judicial system whe...
In the article, I discuss the potential use of public opinion polls to measure the discriminatory ef...
Over the last four decades, trial consultants have become integral members of the venire process. Be...
During jury selection, many courts adopt a minimal approach to voir dire questions, asking a small n...
In the United States, voir dire is viewed as essential to selecting an impartial jury. Judges, lawye...
This study of individualized jury selection for 792 potentialjurors across 12 North Carolina capital...
Jury selection is a cornerstone of the pre-trial preparations done before all cases. The voir dire p...
One question that attorneys in racially charged cases face is whether to attempt to conduct voir dir...
The voir dire process in jury selection, in which the prospective jurors are questioned about their ...
Giving attorneys more power in the voir dire (jury selection) process may allow them to 1) find grou...
Scholarship about racial disparities in jury selection is extensive, but the data about how parties ...
This Article examines the peremptory challenge as modified by Batson and its progeny. The discussion...
Whether judges and attorneys are able to detect bias among potential jurors (venirepersons) is a piv...
The present study asked two important questions: Does prejudicial pretrial publicity produce bias wh...
While the Supreme Court outlawed discrimination in jury selection over 40 years ago, both empirical ...
As illustrated by the recent Los Angeles riots, communities perceive bias in the judicial system whe...
In the article, I discuss the potential use of public opinion polls to measure the discriminatory ef...
Over the last four decades, trial consultants have become integral members of the venire process. Be...