Add to ORKGThis article considers whether a statute or rule of court allowing the prosecution to appeal a directed verdict of not guilty, or its equivalent, would be constitutional under the Double Jeopardy Clause
This Recent Development first traces the evolution of the double jeopardy doctrine. The Recent Devel...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
Parliament enacted a statute in 1996 intended to limit the double jeopardy bar in some situations in...
This article considers whether a statute or rule of court allowing the prosecution to appeal a direc...
As part of a continuing series of papers on impediments to the search for truth in criminal investig...
More than 240 years ago, Sir William Blackstone, perhaps the most important commentator on the Engli...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
Defendant had been acquitted of a criminal charge of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat an incom...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Evans v. Michigan, in which the Court has a...
On December 8, 1993, a Cook County, Illinois, grand jury returned an indictment\u27 charging Harry A...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
This Recent Development first traces the evolution of the double jeopardy doctrine. The Recent Devel...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
Parliament enacted a statute in 1996 intended to limit the double jeopardy bar in some situations in...
This article considers whether a statute or rule of court allowing the prosecution to appeal a direc...
As part of a continuing series of papers on impediments to the search for truth in criminal investig...
More than 240 years ago, Sir William Blackstone, perhaps the most important commentator on the Engli...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
This Note argues that the rationale of the Supreme Court\u27s post-conviction cases cannot be extend...
Defendant had been acquitted of a criminal charge of wilfully attempting to evade or defeat an incom...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Evans v. Michigan, in which the Court has a...
On December 8, 1993, a Cook County, Illinois, grand jury returned an indictment\u27 charging Harry A...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
This Recent Development first traces the evolution of the double jeopardy doctrine. The Recent Devel...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...