In its recent decision in Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., the Seventh Circuit overruled its prior circuit precedent and found that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not create liability for mixed-motive claims. As a result of this decision, if an employer impermissibly considers an employee\u27s disability in making a decision adverse to the employee, courts will not hold the employer liable provided that the plaintiff cannot also show that such consideration was the but-for cause of the challenged action. Prior to 2009, the Seventh Circuit had recognized mixed-motive causation under the ADA; it relied primarily on Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, which found that Title VII\u27s phrase because of allowed for mixed-motive c...
Through enactment of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, Congress unequivo...
In its recent decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, the Seventh Circuit clarified its approach to t...
This Note addresses the practice in California state courts of applying federal precedent from cases...
In its recent decision in Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., the Seventh Circuit overruled its p...
Two federal circuits, borrowing from Title VII jurisprudence, recently recognized a cause of action ...
Although the Americans with Disabilities Act was lauded as a statute that would bring long-overdue r...
Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. holds that a hostile work environment is actionable under the Americ...
On May 25, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, reversed seventee...
Congress initially enacted the ADA in 1990 as a seemingly expansive civil rights statute aimed at er...
The definition of disability is among the most frequently litigated issues under the Americans wit...
In two separate decisions this spring—Comcast v. National Association of African American-Owned Medi...
On September 20, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Severson v. Heartland Wo...
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) creates and protects employment opportunities for disabled...
A significant failure. That is how the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) has been described by...
In Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., the United States Supreme Court was asked to clarify wheth...
Through enactment of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, Congress unequivo...
In its recent decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, the Seventh Circuit clarified its approach to t...
This Note addresses the practice in California state courts of applying federal precedent from cases...
In its recent decision in Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., the Seventh Circuit overruled its p...
Two federal circuits, borrowing from Title VII jurisprudence, recently recognized a cause of action ...
Although the Americans with Disabilities Act was lauded as a statute that would bring long-overdue r...
Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. holds that a hostile work environment is actionable under the Americ...
On May 25, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, reversed seventee...
Congress initially enacted the ADA in 1990 as a seemingly expansive civil rights statute aimed at er...
The definition of disability is among the most frequently litigated issues under the Americans wit...
In two separate decisions this spring—Comcast v. National Association of African American-Owned Medi...
On September 20, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Severson v. Heartland Wo...
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) creates and protects employment opportunities for disabled...
A significant failure. That is how the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) has been described by...
In Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., the United States Supreme Court was asked to clarify wheth...
Through enactment of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, Congress unequivo...
In its recent decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, the Seventh Circuit clarified its approach to t...
This Note addresses the practice in California state courts of applying federal precedent from cases...