Add to ORKGThis Article examines the criteria used by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in determining whether or not a judicial opinion should be published. Through an empirical study and analysis, the authors conclude that the written rule governing publication offers little guidance to the judges and is often applied inconsistently within the circuit
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
During the survey year, according to a Westlaw search, the United States Court of Appeals for the El...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
This Article examines the criteria used by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in determining whet...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of l...
Under the standard account of judicial behavior when a panel of appellate court judges cannot agree ...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
Certain publication practices, especially dependence on issuing unpublished opinions, are one major ...
Not all legal cases establish a legal precedent – federal circuit court appeal opinions often go unp...
Most federal intermediate appellate court opinions are “unpublished”— they have no precedential valu...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
During the survey year, according to a Westlaw search, the United States Court of Appeals for the El...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
This Article examines the criteria used by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in determining whet...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of l...
Under the standard account of judicial behavior when a panel of appellate court judges cannot agree ...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
Certain publication practices, especially dependence on issuing unpublished opinions, are one major ...
Not all legal cases establish a legal precedent – federal circuit court appeal opinions often go unp...
Most federal intermediate appellate court opinions are “unpublished”— they have no precedential valu...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
During the survey year, according to a Westlaw search, the United States Court of Appeals for the El...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...